Daniels v. The City Of New York , et al
| Deshawn Daniels |
| The City Of New York, Sheldon Brutus and Police Officer John Does #'s 1-4 |
| 1:2013cv02770 |
| April 25, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| J. Paul Oetken |
| Andrew J. Peck |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
71
OPINION AND ORDER re: 66 MOTION to Enforce Settlement . filed by Derek Wooden, Daniel Ortiz, The City Of New York, Sheldon Brutus, 69 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to file trial documents and to adjourn trial date addre ssed to Judge J. Paul Oetken from Elissa B. Jacobs dated October 17. 2014. filed by Derek Wooden, Daniel Ortiz, The City Of New York, Sheldon Brutus. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion to enforce the settlement agreement is GRANTE D. The parties shall, on or before November 17, 2014, execute a settlement agreement consistent with the terms agreed upon at the October 9, 2014 settlement conference. Defendants' motion for an adjournment of the trial and of associated deadl ines is GRANTED. The final pretrial conference (scheduled for November 6, 2014) and the jury trial (scheduled for November 10, 2014) are hereby adjourned sine die. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the motions at docket numbers 66 and 69. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 10/20/2014) (djc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
