Sullivan v. Barclays PLC et al

Plaintiff: Stephen P Sullivan
Defendant: Barclays PLC, Barclays Bank plc, Barclays Capital Inc., UBS AG, The Royal Bank of Scotland PLC and John Doe Nos. 1-50
Case Number: 1:2013cv02811
Filed: April 29, 2013
Court: New York Southern District Court
Office: Foley Square Office
County: XX Out of State
Presiding Judge: P. Kevin Castel
Nature of Suit: Anti-Trust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 21, 2017 286 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying 197 Motion to Dismiss. Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is DENIED. Because only FrontPoint Australian and CalSTRS can act as efficient enforcers of the antitrust laws, the Complaint's Sherman Act claims are dismissed as to all other plaintiffs on grounds of antitrust standing. The Complaint plausibly alleges the existence of a price-fixing conspiracy as to Count One only, and Count Two, Count Three and Count Four are therefore dismissed in their entirely. The Complaint fails to state a claim as to Counts Five through Seven except as to defendants UBS and Rabobank. Counts Eight and Nine are dismissed because plaintiffs' RICO claims are based on extraterritorial pr edicate acts. The Complaint plausibly alleges claims of unjust enrichment and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing as to Counts Ten and Eleven. Because plaintiffs have not made out a prima facie case of personal jurisdicti on over any Foreign Defendant, the claims against all Foreign Defendants are dismissed. Therefore, all claims are dismissed in this action, except to the extent that Count One, Count Ten and Count Eleven are asserted against the Citi defendants and the J.P. Morgan defendants. The Clerk is directed to terminate the motion. (Docket # 197.) (As further set forth in this Order.). (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 2/21/2017) (cf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sullivan v. Barclays PLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephen P Sullivan
Represented By: Vincent Briganti
Represented By: Douglas Mason Chalmers
Represented By: Raymond P Girnys
Represented By: Geoffrey Milbank Horn
Represented By: Gary S. Jacobson
Represented By: Christopher Lovell
Represented By: Peter D. St. Phillip, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Barclays PLC
Represented By: David H Braff
Represented By: Michael A. Brille
Represented By: Matthew S. Fitzwater
Represented By: Matthew Joseph Porpora
Represented By: Yvonne S. Quinn
Represented By: Jonathan David Schiller
Represented By: Jeffrey T Scott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Barclays Bank plc
Represented By: David H Braff
Represented By: Michael A. Brille
Represented By: Matthew S. Fitzwater
Represented By: Matthew Joseph Porpora
Represented By: Yvonne S. Quinn
Represented By: Jonathan David Schiller
Represented By: Jeffrey T Scott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Barclays Capital Inc.
Represented By: David H Braff
Represented By: Michael A. Brille
Represented By: Matthew S. Fitzwater
Represented By: Matthew Joseph Porpora
Represented By: Yvonne S. Quinn
Represented By: Jonathan David Schiller
Represented By: Jeffrey T Scott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UBS AG
Represented By: Jarrett Arp
Represented By: David C. Bohan
Represented By: Rachel Alden Lavery
Represented By: Joel Steven Sanders
Represented By: Peter Sullivan
Represented By: Peter A Sullivan
Represented By: Sheldon Toby Zenner
Represented By: Lawrence Jay Zweifach
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Royal Bank of Scotland PLC
Represented By: Alejandra De Urioste
Represented By: Thomas Anthony Doyle
Represented By: Robert G. Houck
Represented By: Fraser Lee Hunter, Jr
Represented By: David Sapir Lesser
Represented By: James Miller
Represented By: Charles C Platt
Represented By: Alan Schoenfeld
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe Nos. 1-50
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?