Shah v. Lumiere et al
| Sachin Shah |
| Justin S. Lumiere, Stefan Lorca De St. Pierre Lumiere, Lester L. Levy and Jon Doe(S) |
| 1:2013cv02975 |
| May 2, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Essex |
| Lorna G. Schofield |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Other |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
241
OPINION AND ORDER re: 220 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Lester L. Levy. For the foregoing reasons, Levy's motion for summary judgment is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motion at Docket No. 220. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 10/31/2016) (cla)
|
|
Filing
46
OPINION AND ORDER re: 27 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint by Defendant Lester Levy, filed by Lester L. Levy. For the reasons stated above, Defendant's motion to dismiss Plaintiff's defamation claim based upon statements made prior t o May 1, 2012, is granted. Plaintiff's defamation claim for statements made after May 1, 2012, remain. Defendant's motion to dismiss Plaintiff's tortious interference with contract claim is denied. Defendant's motion to dismiss Plaintiff's claims for tortious interference with prospective business relations and for malicious prosecution is granted. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 12/3/2013) (ja) Modified on 12/4/2013 (ja).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
