Curtis v. Cenlar FSB et al
| Thomas M. Curtis |
| Cenlar FSB, Cenlar Agency, Inc., Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, American Security Insurance Company and Assurant, Inc. |
| 1:2013cv03007 |
| May 3, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Denise L. Cote |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
93
OPINION & ORDER. The plaintiff's August 1, 2014 motion for partial summary judgment is denied and defendants' August 1, 2014 motion for summary judgment is granted in full. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment for the defendant and close this case. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 11/5/2014) Copies Mailed By Chambers To Thomas M. Curtis. (gr)
|
|
Filing
39
OPINION & ORDER re: 12 MOTION to Dismiss. filed by Assurant, Inc., American Security Insurance Company. The Assurant defendants' June 7, 2013 motion to dismiss is granted in its entirety. All claims against American Security and Assurant are dismissed. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 11/12/2013) Copies Mailed By Chambers (djc) Modified on 11/13/2013 (djc).
|
|
Filing
38
OPINION & ORDER denying 22 Motion to Remand to State Court. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 10/3/2013) Copies Mailed TO Thomas M. Curtis By Chambers. (gr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
