Silva et al v. Cofresi et al
||Jose Vasquez Cofresi
||May 10, 2013
||New York Southern District Court
||Foley Square Office
||XX Out of State
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||15:1114 Trademark Infringement
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|August 1, 2014
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: granting in part and denying in part 33 Motion to Strike. For the foregoing reasons, the plaintiff's motion (Docket no. 33) is granted in part and denied in part. As the defendant willfully did not comply with a court or der and provided discovery responses only after the instant motion was filed, the defendant shall pay the attorney's fees and costs associated with filing the motion, as well as the $65.30 incurred by the plaintiff in sending the defendant copies of the outstanding discovery requests. The defendant shall provide substantive responses to the plaintiff's Interrogatories and Second Request for Production by September 2, 2014. Failure to comply shall result in dismissal of the defendant's counterclaims and entry of a default judgment. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 8/1/2014) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (djc)
|November 19, 2014
MEMO ENDORSEMENT re: 56 Report and Recommendations. ENDORSEMENT: I have reviewed the "objections". They are entirely without merit in view of the excellent and convincing Report of Judge Francis. I adopt the Report as the opinion of the Court, strike the answer and counterclaims, and direct entry of judgment for plaintiff by default. The clerk will enter judgment and close the case. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 11/19/2014) (kgo)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.