Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Roxane Laboratories, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Southern District Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Roxane Laboratories, Inc.

Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Roxane Laboratories, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Defendant:	Roxane Laboratories, Inc.
Case Number:	1:2013cv03288
Filed:	May 15, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	XX Out of State
Presiding Judge:	Thomas P. Griesa
Nature of Suit:	Patent
Cause of Action:	35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 10, 2019	Filing 258 OPINION AND ORDER. For the foregoing reasons, Endo's motions to appeal the Clerk's decisions on the taxation of costs are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Endo is awarded an additional $831.31 in the Amneal case, No. 12 Civ. 8115, a nd an additional $1,660.06 in the Roxane case, No. 13 Civ. 3288. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motion at Docket Number 195 in No. 12 Civ. 8115 and the motion at Docket Number 250 in No. 13 Civ. 3288. SO ORDERED. re: 250 MOTION to Appeal Clerk's Decision on Taxation of Costs re: 247 Taxation of Costs, filed by Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 6/10/2019) (rjm)
March 19, 2015	Filing 153 OPINION: Plaintiff's motion to strike Roxane's affirmative defense of unclean hands is hereby denied. This opinion resolves the item listed as document number 110 in this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Thomas P. Griesa on 3/19/2015) (kl)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 10, 2019

Filing 258 OPINION AND ORDER. For the foregoing reasons, Endo's motions to appeal the Clerk's decisions on the taxation of costs are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Endo is awarded an additional $831.31 in the Amneal case, No. 12 Civ. 8115, a nd an additional $1,660.06 in the Roxane case, No. 13 Civ. 3288. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motion at Docket Number 195 in No. 12 Civ. 8115 and the motion at Docket Number 250 in No. 13 Civ. 3288. SO ORDERED. re: 250 MOTION to Appeal Clerk's Decision on Taxation of Costs re: 247 Taxation of Costs, filed by Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 6/10/2019) (rjm)

March 19, 2015

Filing 153 OPINION: Plaintiff's motion to strike Roxane's affirmative defense of unclean hands is hereby denied. This opinion resolves the item listed as document number 110 in this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Thomas P. Griesa on 3/19/2015) (kl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Roxane Laboratories, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Represented By:	Martin J. Black
Represented By:	Jonathan D Loeb
Represented By:	Robert D Rhoad
Represented By:	Joshua Isaac Sherman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Roxane Laboratories, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?