Prime International Trading, Ltd. v. BP Plc et al
| Prime International Trading, Ltd. |
| BP Plc, Royal Dutch Shell Plc, Statoil ASA and John Doe Nos. 1-50 |
| 1:2013cv03473 |
| May 22, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Andrew L. Carter |
| Securities/Commodities |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1 Antitrust Litigation |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
193
OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS re: (236 in 1:13-md-02475-ALC) MOTION to Dismiss DEFENDANTS TRAFIGURA A.G. AND TRAFIGURA BEHEER B.V.'S NOTICE OF MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' AMENDED CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND PLA INTIFFS' AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT filed by Trafigura AG, Trafigura Beheer B.V.; (229 in 1:13-md-02475-ALC) MOTION to Dismiss Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint filed by Hess Energy Trading Company, LLC; (209 in 1:13-md-0 2475-ALC) MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint filed by Vitol, Inc., Vitol, S.A.; (331 in 1:13-md-02475-ALC) MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint f iled by Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc.; (333 in 1:13-md-02475-ALC) AMENDED MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Class Action Complaints filed by Phibro Commodities Ltd., Phibro Trading L.L.C.; (223 in 1:13-md-02475-ALC) MOTION t o Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Class Action Complaints filed by Phibro Trading L.L.C.; (225 in 1:13-md-02475-ALC) MOTION to Dismiss the Trader Plaintiffs' Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint for Failure to State a Claim as to Shell Trading (US) Company and Royal Dutch Shell, plc and for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction as to Royal Dutch Shell, plc filed by Royal Dutch Shell plc, Shell Trading US Company; (220 in 1:13-md-02475-ALC) MOTION to Dismiss Landowner Plaintif f's Amended Class Action Complaint for Failure to State a Claim and for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction filed by Royal Dutch Shell plc; (200 in 1:13-md-02475-ALC) MOTION to Dismiss (Defendants' Notice of Their Joint Motion to Dismiss th e Complaints as Exceeding the Extraterritorial Reach of U.S. Law) filed by Statoil US Holdings Inc., Statoil ASA; (213 in 1:13-md-02475-ALC) MOTION to Dismiss Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint and Amended Class Action Complaint file d by BP Corporation North America, Inc., BP PLC, BP America, Inc.; (218 in 1:13-md-02475-ALC) JOINT MOTION to Dismiss Landowner Plaintiff's Amended Class Action Complaint on behalf of Royal Dutch Shell plc, BP plc, Statoil ASA, Statoil US Holdings Inc., Morgan Stanley, Trafigura AG, Phibro Trading LLC, and Hess Energy Trading Company L filed by Royal Dutch Shell plc; (204 in 1:13-md-02475-ALC) MOTION to Dismiss Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint filed by BP Corpora tion North America, Inc., Vitol, Inc., Morgan Stanley, Statoil ASA, Trafigura AG, Vitol, S.A., Statoil US Holdings Inc., BP PLC,, Mercuria Energy Trading, Inc., Royal Dutch Shell plc, Phibro Trading L.L.C., Trafigura Beheer B.V. , BP America, Inc., Shell Trading US Company, Hess Energy Trading Company, LLC; (83 in 1:13-cv-07443-ALC) MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint filed by Morgan Stanley Capital Group, Inc.; ( 232 in 1:13-md-02475-ALC) MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Morgan Stanley's Notice of Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint and Plaintiffs Amended Class Action Complaint filed by Morgan Stanley; (214 in 1:13-m d-02475-ALC) MOTION to Dismiss the Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint filed by Mercuria Energy Trading, Inc.; (203 in 1:13-md-02475-ALC) MOTION to Dismiss (Statoil's Notice of Motion to Dismiss the Complaints for Lack of Subje ct Matter Jurisdiction Under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act and for Failure to State a Claim) filed by Statoil ASA, Statoil US Holdings Inc. For all of the foregoing reasons, the Landowner Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint and the Trader Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint are dismissed. The motions filed by individual Defendants for dismissal of the Complaints as to them are denied without prejudice as moot. The Court will hold a status conference in this matter on July 7, 20 17, at 2:00 p.m. The parties (and/or counsel) should appear in person in Courtroom 1306 at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, New York, NY, on the date and time specified above. SO ORDERED. (Status Conference set for 7/7/2017 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 1306, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr.) (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 6/8/2017) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:13-md-02475-ALC et al.(anc)
|
|
Filing
180
OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT STATOIL ASA: For the foregoing reasons, the Court does not have subject-matter jurisdiction over the claims against Defendant Statoil ASA. Statoil ASA is therefore dismissed from this matter. T he claims against Statoil U.S. remain and the Court will address Statoil U.S.'s non-jurisdictional arguments for dismissal in conjunction with the non-jurisdictional arguments advanced by the other remaining defendants. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 3/29/2016) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:13-md-02475-ALC et al.(kgo) Modified on 3/29/2016 (kgo).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
