Intellectual Ventures II L.L.C. v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. et al
Plaintiff: Intellectual Ventures II L.L.C.
Defendant: JP Morgan Chase & Co., JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association and Chase Bank USA, National Association
Case Number: 1:2013cv03777
Filed: June 4, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: XX Out of State
Presiding Judge: Analisa Torres
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 21, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 570 ORDER AND OPINION DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BASED UPON NON-INFRINGEMENT: For the foregoing reasons, JPMC's motion for summary judgment is denied. JPMC's motion to strike IV's infringement contentions is severed and covered by separate order. The motions to seal are granted. The Clerk shall mark the motions (Doc. Nos. 534, 536, 544, 546) terminated, with Doc. No. 530 remaining open as to the motion to strike IV's infringement contentions. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein on 7/21/2016) (cf)
June 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 449 ORDER AND OPINION DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BASED UPON NONINFRINGEMENT re: 388 MOTION for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,634,666 filed by JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, Chase Ba nk USA, National Association, Paymentech LLC, JP Morgan Chase & Co., Chase Paymentech Solutions, LLC: For the foregoing reasons, JPMC's motion is DENIED. The Clerk shall mark the motion (Doc. No. 388) terminated. The stay of discovery im posed at the May 21, 2015 status conference, see Order Summarizing May 21, 2015 Status Conference, No 13 Civ. 3777, ECF No. 406 (S.D.N.Y. May 21, 2015), is hereby lifted. Fact discovery shall be completed by September 15, 2015, the same date as fa ct discovery related to the '574 Patent is scheduled to be complete. The status conference scheduled for August 10, 2015 is cancelled. A status conference on the two remaining patents in dispute shall be held on September 17, 2015 at 11:00 a.m. (Signed by Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein on 6/30/2015) (tn)
June 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 442 ORDER AND OPINION DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS AND FOR TERMINATING SANCTION re: 395 MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's '574 Patent Interrogatory Response. filed by JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, Chase Bank USA, National Association, Paymentech LLC, JP Morgan Chase & Co., Chase Paymentech Solutions, LLC. For the foregoing reasons, JPMC's motion is DENIED. The Clerk shall mark the motion (Doc. No. 395) terminated. (Signed by Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein on 6/22/2015) (tro)
April 28, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 381 ORDER AND OPINION GRANTING MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT. For the foregoing reasons, JPMC's motion is GRANTED and Intellectual Ventures' claims with respect to the '694 Patent, the '084 Patent, and the '409 Patent (Coun ts 2, 3, and 4 of the Complaint, respectively) are dismissed. The Clerk shall mark the motion (Doc. No. 252) terminated. The parties shall appear for a status conference on May 19, 2015 at 10:30 a.m. to discuss the status of proceedings related to th e remaining Counts of the Complaint: Count 1, relating to Patent No. 5,745,574, and Count 5, relating to Patent No. 7,634,666. re: 252 MOTION for Summary Judgment of Invalidity for Lack of Patentable Subject Matter Under 35 U.S.C. § 1 01 filed by JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, Chase Bank USA, National Association, Paymentech LLC, JP Morgan Chase & Co., Chase Paymentech Solutions, LLC. (Status Conference set for 5/19/2015 at 10:30 AM before Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein.) (Signed by Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein on 4/28/2015) (rjm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Intellectual Ventures II L.L.C. v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Intellectual Ventures II L.L.C.
Represented By: David Alberti
Represented By: Marc C. Belloli
Represented By: Elizabeth Day
Represented By: William Irvin Dunnegan
Represented By: Ian Feinberg
Represented By: Benjamin Daniel Liebowitz
Represented By: Sal Lim
Represented By: Yakov Zolotorev
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JP Morgan Chase & Co.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chase Bank USA, National Association
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?