Escoffer v. New York Police Department et al
Plaintiff: Dana N. Escoffier
Defendant: New York Police Department, Time Equities, Inc., Hudson Street Equities, John Doe, Jane Doe and I.A.B
Case Number: 1:2013cv03918
Filed: June 6, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: New York
Presiding Judge: Unassigned
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 191 ORDER. The Court has been informed that the parties have reached a settlement in principle of this case. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without costs and without prejudice to restoring the action to the Court's calendar, provided the application to restore the action is made within thirty days. All filing deadlines and conference dates are adjourned sine die. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 2/25/2020) (rjm)
February 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 187 ORDER: The parties are directed to appear for a conference to schedule a date for trial on April 27, 2020, at 4:00 p.m. in Courtroom 706 of the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, New York, NY 10007. ( Status Conference set for 4/27/2020 at 04:00 PM in Courtroom 706, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge J. Paul Oetken.) (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 2/11/2020) Copies Mailed by Chambers. (mro) Modified on 2/11/2020 (mro).
September 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 178 OPINION AND ORDER re: 163 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Sgt. Balunas, Officer Marte, City of New York. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motions at Docket Numbers 163 and 177. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 9/30/2019) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (mro)
July 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 149 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: for 140 Report and Recommendation. The Court has reviewed the remaining portions of Magistrate Judge Freeman's thorough and well-reasoned Report, to which no objections were made, and finds no clear error on the face of the record. Judge Freeman's conclusion, that Mr. Escoffier's claims against the John and Jane Doe defendants be dismissed as time-barred, was not based on any legal errors and is correct. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS t he recommendation in the Report that Mr. Escoffier's claims against the John and Jane Doe defendants be dismissed. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 7/27/2017) Copies Mailed By Chambers. ** Party John Doe (1-20) terminated. (ama) Modified on 7/27/2017 (ama).
January 4, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 141 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: re: 119 MOTION to Amend/Correct 11 30/60 Days Amended Complaint filed by Dana N. Escoffier, 137 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery addressed to Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman from John L. Garcia dated December 13, 2016 filed by Officer Marte. For all of the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's motion to amend (Dkt. 119) is granted in part and denied in part, as set out herein. Further, in light of the amendment, and for t he additional reasons stated in the parties' recent letters to the Court (Dkts. 137, 138), the deadline for the completion of all fact discovery in this action is extended to March 31, 2017. Consistent with this Memorandum and Order, the Clerk of Court is directed to close Dkts. 119 and 137 on the Docket of this action. SO ORDERED., ( Fact Discovery due by 3/31/2017.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman on 1/04/2017) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (ama)
February 11, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 94 OPINION AND ORDER: re: 81 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rule 12(b)(6) filed by Officer Robertson, Sgt./Lt. Anderson, Det. Walsh, Chief Campisi, Officer Alberici, Sgt. Termine, Officer Marino, Officer Basnight, Sgt. Call e, Officer Belger, Detective Smithson, Officer Severino, Sgt. Aynbinder, Sgt. Balunas, Officer Medoza, City of New York, Det. Wheeler, Officer Abbott, Officer Castillo, Insp. Cokkinos, Sgt. Det. Nilan, Officer Fusco, Thompson, Officer Baranski, Officer Marte, Det. Biondolilo. In sum, Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED with respect to claims based on the failure of police to make an arrest in response to his complaints, claims for excessive force and conspiracy, and claims based on the First Amendment and Title VII. The motion to dismiss is DENIED with respect to claims based on possible violations of the ADA and the Fourth Amendment. The remaining Defendants shall file an answer to the complaint within 30 days of this order.The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motion at Docket Number 81. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 2/11/2016) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (ama)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Escoffer v. New York Police Department et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dana N. Escoffier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: New York Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Time Equities, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hudson Street Equities
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jane Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: I.A.B
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?