McCarthy-O'Keefe v. Local 298/851 IBT Employer Group Pension Trust Fund (Savasta & Co) et al
| Clare McCarthy-O'Keefe |
| Local 298/851 IBT Employer Group Pension Trust Fund (Savasta & Co), Local 295/851 IBT Board of Trustee's, Local 295/851 - Union and DHL Express |
| 1:2013cv04785 |
| July 10, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Suffolk |
| Jesse M. Furman |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
58
OPINION AND ORDER re: 43 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Local 295/851 IBT Board of Trustee's, Local 298/851 IBT Employer Group Pension Trust Fund (Savasta & Co), 51 MOTION to Amend/Correct 11 Amended Complaint, file d by Clare McCarthy-O'Keefe: The Court has reviewed all of Plaintiff's arguments and finds them to be without merit. Accordingly, and for the reasons stated above, Plaintiff's motion to supplement the administrative record is DEN IED, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and the Amended Complaint is dismissed. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Docket Nos. 43 and 51 and to close the case. The Clerk of Court is further directed to mail a copy of this Opinion and Order to Plaintiff. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 2/24/2015) (tn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
