OOCL (USA) Corp v. Transco Shipping Corp et al
Plaintiff: OOCL (USA) Corp
Defendant: Transco Shipping Corp and Transco Shipping Logistics Corp
Case Number: 1:2013cv05418
Filed: August 2, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: Queens
Presiding Judge: Richard J. Sullivan
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 23, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 103 OPINION AND ORDER re: 86 MOTION to Alter Judgment or Amend Judgment (Rule 59(e)) filed by Transco Shipping Corp. For the reasons stated above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Defendant's motion for reconsideration is DENIE D, although the Court makes one modification to the December 23 Opinion. Specifically, the Court eliminates the phrase "[a]fter endorsing and presenting each bill of lading" in the first full sentence on page 5 of that Opinion and Or der, so that the sentence shall state only that "Defendant notified the third-party buyer of the arrival of the cargo." IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT, in addition to the $57,473 judgment already awarded, Plaintiff is awarded prejudgm ent interest at a rate of 0.4251 percent from August 29, 2008 to the date of this Order, as well as $8,620.95 in reasonable attorneys' fees and $2,297.90 in reasonable costs. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to enter final judgment for Plaintiff consistent with this Order and the Court's December 23 Opinion (Doc. No. 85), to terminate the motion pending at docket number 86, and to close this case. (As further set forth in this Opinion and Order.) (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 8/23/2016) (mro)
December 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 85 OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons stated above, the Court finds in favor of Plaintiff for its breach of contract claim in the amount of $57,473, plus prejudgment interest, reasonable attorney's fees, and costs. The Court neverthe less dismisses Plaintiff's account stated claim as duplicative. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT, no later than January 22, 2016, Plaintiff shall submit a proposed judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT, also by January 22, 2016, Plaintiff shall submit an application for fees and costs to the Court including a sworn declaration providing counsel's background, experience, and billing rate at the time the work was expended, as well as copies of the attorney's time sheets. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT, also by January 22, 2016, Defendant shall submit a proposal for prejudgment interest in accordance with the guidelines described in this Opinion and Order. Defendant may submit papers opposing Plaintiff's submissions no later than February 5, 2016. (As further set forth in this Opinion and Order.) (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 12/23/2015) (mro)
March 11, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 51 OPINION AND ORDER re: 30 MOTION for Summary Judgment or Partial Summary Judgment. filed by Transco Shipping Corp, Transco Shipping Logistics Corp. For the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Court DENIES Defendant' s motion for summary judgment on the breach of contract and account stated claims and GRANTS Defendant's motion for summary judgment on the unjust enrichment claim. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion located at docket number 30. In addition, because Plaintiff has withdrawn its sole claim against Defendant Transco Shipping Logistics Corp., the Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate Defendant Transco Shipping Logistics Corp. from this action. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 3/11/2015) (ajs)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: OOCL (USA) Corp v. Transco Shipping Corp et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: OOCL (USA) Corp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Transco Shipping Corp
Represented By: Ying Liu
Represented By: Carolyn J. Shields
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Transco Shipping Logistics Corp
Represented By: Ying Liu
Represented By: Carolyn J. Shields
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?