Industrial Quick Search, Inc. et al v. Miller, Rosado & Algois, LLP et al
Plaintiff: Industrial Quick Search, Inc., Michael Meiresonne and Meiresonne & Associates
Defendant: Miller, Rosado & Algois, LLP, Chris Rodado and Neil A. Miller, Esq.
Case Number: 1:2013cv05589
Filed: August 12, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: XX Out of State
Presiding Judge: Edgardo Ramos
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 161 ORDER: For the reasons discussed at the February 2, 2021 settlement-related conference, counsel shall email a joint confidential settlement status letter to Judge Moses's chambers at Moses_NYSDChambers@nysd.uscourts.gov no later than February 9, 2021. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses on 2/02/2021) (ama)
January 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 160 ORDER: The settlement-related conference currently scheduled for February 1, 2021, at 10:00 a.m. is hereby ADJOURNED to February 2, 2021, at 9:30 a.m. At that time, counsel shall dial (888) 557-8511, enter the access code 7746387, and then enter a security code which will be emailed to the parties closer to the date of the conference. Clients need not attend the conference. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses on 1/28/2021) (jca)
January 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 159 ORDER: The Court is in receipt of confidential settlement communications, emailed directly to chambers, from plaintiffs and defendants, requesting assistance with a discrete issue relating to settlement. Judge Moses will conduct a settlement-related conference on February 1, 2021, at 10:00 a.m. At that time, counsel shall dial (888) 557-8511, enter the access code 7746387, and then enter a security code which will be emailed to the parties closer to the date of the conference. Clients need not a ttend the conference. In advance of the conference, and no later than January 27, 2021, the parties shall email a confidential joint letter to chambers at Moses_NYSDChambers@nysd.uscourts.gov, which shall contain the exact wording each side proposes with respect to the terms over which they disagree. SO ORDERED., ( Settlement Conference set for 2/1/2021 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses on 1/22/2021) (ama)
November 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 156 ORDER: The Court having been advised that all claims asserted herein have been settled, it is ORDERED, that the above-entitled action be and hereby is discontinued, without costs to either party, subject to reopening should the settlement no t be consummated within thirty (30) days of the date hereof. Any application to reopen must be filed within thirty (30) days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, the parties a re advised that if they wish the Court to retain jurisdiction in this matter for purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the next thirty (30) days with a request that the agreement be "so ordered" by the Court. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 11/24/2020) (va)
August 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 150 ORDER granting 148 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. Application GRANTED to the extent that the settlement conference currently scheduled for September 3, 2020 at 2:15 p.m., is hereby ADJOURNED to November 19, 2020, at 2:15 p.m. In advance of the adjourned conference, the parties shall comply with all of the pre-conference requirements previously set forth in the Court's Order Scheduling Settlement Conference (Dkt. No. 144). If an in-person conference is feasible on November 19 in light of public health conditions, it will take place in Courtroom 20A of the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse. If an in- person conference is not feasible on November 19, the Court will not further adjourn the conference on that ba sis. Instead, the settlement conference will go forward via teleconference or video conference, as outlined in paragraph 6 of the Order Scheduling Settlement Conference. SO ORDERED. Settlement Conference set for 11/19/2020 at 02:15 PM in Courtroom 20A, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses on 8/27/2020) (mml)
August 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 149 ORDER with respect to 147 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. The parties are directed to meet and confer and provide mutually available dates for the adjournment. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 8/26/2020) (nb)
May 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 144 ORDER SCHEDULING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: A settlement conference is scheduled before Magistrate Judge Barbara Moses on September 3, 2020, at 2:15 p.m. (As further set forth in this Order.) ( Settlement Conference set for 9/3/2020 at 02:15 PM before Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses on 5/14/2020) (cf)
March 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 136 ORDER: granting 135 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. Application GRANTED. The settlement conference scheduled for March 17, 2020 is ADJOURNED sine die. No later than March 20, 2020, the parties shall file a joint letter proposing three dates, approximately 45 days from today, on which they are available for a settlement conference. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses on 3/13/2020) (ama)
January 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 132 ORDER SCHEDULING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: A settlement conference is scheduled before Magistrate Judge Barbara Moses on March 3, 2020, at 2:15 p.m., in Courtroom 20A, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Settlement Conference set for 3/3/2020 at 02:15 PM in Courtroom 20A, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses on 1/27/2020) (cf)
January 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 78 OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth above, Plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment is DENIED, and Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Specifically, Defendants motion for summary judgment is granted with respect to (1) claims of malpractice stemming from Plaintiff's alleged inquiry regarding the destruction of documents in advance of the August 2003 document production, (2) claims of malpractice stemming from the 200 6 spoliation hearing, (3) claims of malpractice stemming from the negotiation of the settlement, and (4) the breach of contract claim, and denied in all other respects. The parties are directed to appear for a status conference on February 1, 2017 at 11:00 A.M. The Clerks of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions, Docs. 25, 56, and 65, and as further set forth in this order. (Status Conference set for 2/1/2018 at 11:00 AM before Judge Edgardo Ramos.) (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 1/2/2018) (ap) Modified on 1/2/2018 (ap).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Industrial Quick Search, Inc. et al v. Miller, Rosado & Algois, LLP et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Industrial Quick Search, Inc.
Represented By: Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Represented By: Henry S. Emrich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Meiresonne
Represented By: Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Represented By: Henry S. Emrich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Meiresonne & Associates
Represented By: Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Represented By: Henry S. Emrich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Miller, Rosado & Algois, LLP
Represented By: Mark K. Anesh
Represented By: Serena Annelise Cesani
Represented By: Paula Rachel Gilbert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chris Rodado
Represented By: Mark K. Anesh
Represented By: Serena Annelise Cesani
Represented By: Paula Rachel Gilbert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Neil A. Miller, Esq.
Represented By: Mark K. Anesh
Represented By: Serena Annelise Cesani
Represented By: Paula Rachel Gilbert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?