Vasquez v. The County of Rockland et al
| Kim Vasquez |
| The County of Rockland, Mueller and John Does |
| 1:2013cv05632 |
| August 12, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Harold Baer |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
128
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION re: 127 Letter, filed by Kim Vasquez. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration is DENIED. The Court notes that Plaintiff's address on the docket is incorrect. While it is the Plainti ff's responsibility to maintain accurate contact information on the docket, the Court notes the return address on Plaintiff's motion and will send a copy of this order to Plaintiff at that address. The Clerk of Court is thus respectfully di rected to mail a copy of this order, and a copy of the Judgment and Notice of Right o Appeal at ECF No. 126, to Plaintiff at the below address. MAIL TO: Kim Vasquez, 51 New Hempstead, RoadNew City, NY 10956. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave on 10/15/2020) (kv) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing
125
OPINION & ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT: For the reasons set forth above, the Defendants' motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 is GRANTED in its entirety and all of Vasquez's claims are dismissed. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close this case. I further decline to issue a certificate of appealability pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A), as Vasquez has not "made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. §2253(c)(2). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Opinion and Order to the address below. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave on 2/24/2020) (cf) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing. Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER denying without prejudice 60 Application for the Court to Request Counsel. I write to resolve several outstanding issues in this matter. In October 2014, defendants moved for sanctions pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37 based on plaintiff' s failure to appear for his deposition and to provide releases for his medical records. On July 20, 2015, I denied defendants' motion for sanctions without prejudice to renewal, primarily because it was unclear at the time whether plaintiff had actually received notice of defendants' motion. By a letter dated July 21, 2015 (Docket Item 49), defendants' moved for reconsideration of the denial of their motion, noting that plaintiff had actually served papers in opposition to their motion for sanctions and that it was clear, therefore, that plaintiff did receive actual notice of the motion. Defendants' motion for reconsideration is denied as further set forth in this order. In Docket Item 60, plaintiff app lies for pro bono counsel. For the reasons set forth below, this application is denied without prejudice to renewal as further set forth in this order. Accordingly, to the extent Docket Item 56 can be construed as a motion to amend, the applicatio n is denied without prejudice to renewal as further set forth in this order. The following schedule will apply to future proceedings in this matter. 1. The parties shall respond to any discovery requests that are currently outstanding within 30 days of this Order. 2. All fact discovery shall be completed no later than Monday, August 1, 2016. 3. If plaintiff wishes to forego his right to conduct discovery by way of depositions, he may serve up to 100 interrogatories without regard to the limita tions set forth in Local Civil Rule 33.3. Plaintiff's service of more than 25 interrogatories will be deemed a waiver of his right to conduct depositions. 4. Dispositive motions, if any shall be served and filed no later than September 15, 2016. 5. The pretrial order, in the form required by my rules, along with all other pretrial material required by my rules shall be filed on October 15, 2016, or thirty days after the final decision on any dispositive motion (if the pretrial order is s till necessary after such decision), whichever date is later. Plaintiff shall serve a draft of his portion of the Pretrial Order on counsel for defendants no later than fifteen days prior to the Pretrial Order's due date. For the convenience of all parties, a copy of my rules is available on the Court's website: www.nysd.uscourts.gov. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 2/2/2016) Copies Sent By Chambers. (lmb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
