Nials et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
Plaintiff: Shamaine D. Nials and Matthew A. Nials
Defendant: Bank of America, N.A., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), Mortgage Electronic Registrations Systems, Inc. (MERS), Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) and John/Jane Doe 1-Infinity
Case Number: 1:2013cv05720
Filed: August 15, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: New York
Presiding Judge: Alison J. Nathan
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 12 U.S.C. ยง 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 4, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER. Before the Court is Judge Francis' report and recommendation ("R & R") recommending that the Court dismiss this action for failure to obey a pretrial order and for failure to prosecute, pursuant to Rule 16(f)(l) and Rule 41 (b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendants having filed no objections to the R & R, and the Court finding no clear error therein, the Court adopts the R & R in its entirety. This case is therefore DISMISSED and the Clerk of Court is instructed to terminate the case. Re 51 Report and Recommendation. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 6/4/2015) (rjm)
March 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER granting 7 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 13 Motion to Dismiss; denying 22 Motion to Remand to State Court. The Plaintiffs' motion to remand is DENIED. The FDIC's motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Bank of Am erica's and the JP Morgan Defendant's motions to dismiss are GRANTED IN PART as to Plaintiffs' RICO, FCRA, TILA, and RESPA claims, and are DENIED IN PART as to Plaintiffs' state law claims, without prejudice to raise the arguments made in the motions to dismiss in the future following the Court's assessment of whether jurisdiction over Plaintiffs' state law claims is appropriate in this Court. This decision resolves docket numbers 7, 13, 20, and 22. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 3/21/2014) (ajs)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nials et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shamaine D. Nials
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Matthew A. Nials
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bank of America, N.A.
Represented By: Suzanne Michelle Berger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Represented By: Brian J Markowitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)
Represented By: Marie D. Nardino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mortgage Electronic Registrations Systems, Inc. (MERS)
Represented By: Brian J Markowitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae)
Represented By: Brian J Markowitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John/Jane Doe 1-Infinity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?