In Re: Borders Group, Inc.
| Borders Group, Inc. |
| Eric Beeman, Jane Freij and Robert Traktman |
| BGI Creditors Liquidating Trust and Curtis R. Smith |
| 1:2013cv05754 |
| August 16, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Shira A. Scheindlin |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
OPINION AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, Appellants motion for certification of a direct appeal to the Second Circuit and for stay relief is denied. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this motion (Docket # 9). Pursuant to Bankruptcy Rul e of Procedure 8009(a)(1) ("Rule 8009(a)(1)"), Appellants opening brief was due on August 30, 2013. Appellants have not yet filed an appellate brief. If Appellants wish to pursue this appeal, they must file their opening appeal brief by Fe bruary 4, 2014. Failure to submit a brief by that date will result in dismissal of this appeal pursuant to Rule 8009( a)( 1). Appellees' response is due fourteen days from the filing of Appellants' brief, and Appellants' reply is due seven days from the filing of Appellees' response. No extensions will be permitted. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 1/28/2014) (cd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
