Collazo v. Commissioner of Social Security

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Southern District Collazo v. Commissioner of Social Security

Collazo v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff:	Oscar E. Collazo
Defendant:	Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number:	1:2013cv05758
Filed:	August 15, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	Bronx
Presiding Judge:	Henry B. Pitman
Presiding Judge:	Richard J. Sullivan
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405 Rev. of Final Dec. of Sec. of HEW re: S.S. Benefits
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 11, 2016	Filing 38 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopting 37 Report and Recommendations, granting in part denying in part 30 Motion for Judgment filed by Oscar E. Collazo. Having reviewed Judge Pitman's comprehensive sixty-two-page Repo rt, the Court finds that the reasoning and conclusions set forth therein are not facially or clearly erroneous. The Court thus adopts the Report in its entirety. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED to the extent he seeks an award of benefits but GRANTED to the extent he seeks remand, Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED, and the case is REMANDED to the ALJ pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The Clerk o f the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions pending at docket numbers 17 and 30 and to close this case. (As further set forth in this Order Adopting Report and Recommendation.) (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 1/11/2016) (mro) Modified on 1/11/2016 (mro).

Date Filed

Document Text

January 11, 2016

Filing 38 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopting 37 Report and Recommendations, granting in part denying in part 30 Motion for Judgment filed by Oscar E. Collazo. Having reviewed Judge Pitman's comprehensive sixty-two-page Repo rt, the Court finds that the reasoning and conclusions set forth therein are not facially or clearly erroneous. The Court thus adopts the Report in its entirety. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED to the extent he seeks an award of benefits but GRANTED to the extent he seeks remand, Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED, and the case is REMANDED to the ALJ pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The Clerk o f the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions pending at docket numbers 17 and 30 and to close this case. (As further set forth in this Order Adopting Report and Recommendation.) (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 1/11/2016) (mro) Modified on 1/11/2016 (mro).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Collazo v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Oscar E. Collazo
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By:	Susan D. Baird
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?