Gable v. SA Midtown LLC et al
| Wioleta Gable |
| SA Midtown LLC, G & D Restaurant Associates LLC, Dimitri Pauli, Gherardo Guarducci and Andrea Nanni |
| 1:2013cv05928 |
| August 21, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Richmond |
| Paul A. Crotty |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
OPINION AND ORDER. I conclude that the settlement reached by the parties is fair and reasonable. The claims and defenses of both sides rest primarily on testimonial evidence, making it particularly difficult to predict the outcome of the case. At t he settlement conference, counsel for both sides demonstrated a mastery of the evidence and pertinent legal principles; counsel for both sides also represented their respective clients zealously. Given the conflicting evidence, the quality of the evi dence and the allocation of the burden of proof on plaintiffs, the settlement represents a reasonable compromise with respect to contested issues, and, therefore, I approve it. Reyes v. Altamarea Group, LLC, 10 Civ. 6451 (RLE), 2011 WL 4599822 at *6 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 16, 2011)(Ellis, M.J.) (As further set forth in this Order) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 6/22/2015) Copies Sent By Chambers. (lmb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
