Richardson et al v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision employees et al
| Roland Richardson |
| Lawrence, Carol Liciago, Liciago, R. Lardo, William Haas, Patrick J. Griffin, New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision employees, Leitenant Sipple and Bruno |
| 1:2013cv06189 |
| August 30, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Westchester |
| Lorna G. Schofield |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
OPINION AND ORDER re: 18 MOTION to Dismiss. filed by Leitenant Sipple, R. Lardo, Carol Liciago, William Haas, Liciago, Lawrence, Bruno, Patrick J. Griffin, New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision employe es. Pro se Plaintiffs Roland Richardson and Kishma Richardson brought suit against a number of employees of the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision for civil rights violations arising from alleged incidents at the Sull ivan Correctional Facility, where Mr. Richardson was incarcerated. This action is now before the Court on Defendants' motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). For the following reasons, Defendants& #039; motion is converted into a motion for summary judgment for purposes of Mr. Richardson's claims, and is granted in its entirety. The Clerk of Court is directed to close all open motions and the case. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 8/11/2014) (kgo)
|
|
Filing
9
OPINION AND ORDER re: 8 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 5 Order of Service filed by Roland Richardson. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration is denied. Neither this Opinion and Order nor the Order for which Plain tiff sought reconsideration prevents Kishma Richardson and K-Sean Stuart Richey from joining this action on their own behalf. They are encouraged to contact the Pro Se Office of this Court for assistance if they wish to join this action. The Clerk is directed to close Docket No. 8 and mail a copy of this Opinion and Order to pro se Plaintiff. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 10/17/2013) (lmb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
