McMahan v. Commissioner of Social Security

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Southern District McMahan v. Commissioner of Social Security

McMahan v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff:	Joanne McMahan
Defendant:	Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number:	1:2013cv06546
Filed:	September 13, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	New York
Presiding Judge:	John G. Koeltl
Nature of Suit:	Disability Insurance
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 205
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 20, 2015	Filing 51 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court has considered all of the arguments raised by the parties. To the extent not specifically addressed, the arguments are either moot or without merit. For the foregoing reasons, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted in its entirety, the Commissioner's motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted, the plaintiff's motion for remand is denied, and the Complaint is dismissed. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment and to close this case. re: 21 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Commissioner of Social Security. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 4/18/2015) (rjm)
March 5, 2014	Filing 19 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: re: 15 APPLICATION for the Court to Request Counsel filed by Joanne McMahan. The plaintiff's application for the Court to appoint counsel is therefore denied without prejudice for failure to make the required showing at this time. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 3/05/2014) (ama)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 20, 2015

Filing 51 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court has considered all of the arguments raised by the parties. To the extent not specifically addressed, the arguments are either moot or without merit. For the foregoing reasons, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted in its entirety, the Commissioner's motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted, the plaintiff's motion for remand is denied, and the Complaint is dismissed. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment and to close this case. re: 21 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Commissioner of Social Security. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 4/18/2015) (rjm)

March 5, 2014

Filing 19 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: re: 15 APPLICATION for the Court to Request Counsel filed by Joanne McMahan. The plaintiff's application for the Court to appoint counsel is therefore denied without prejudice for failure to make the required showing at this time. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 3/05/2014) (ama)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McMahan v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joanne McMahan
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By:	Leslie A. Ramirez-Fisher
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?