National Credit Union Administration Board v. Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc. et al
| National Credit Union Administration Board |
| Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc. and Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. |
| 1:2013cv06705 |
| September 23, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Denise L. Cote |
| Securities/Commodities |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 77 Securities Fraud |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
203
ORDER denying 163 Motion for Reconsideration re 54 Memorandum & Opinion; denying 163 Motion for Certificate of Appealability; denying 163 Motion to Stay. (Signed by Judge Denise Cote on 9/30/14) (SR)
|
|
Filing
143
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER. Morgan Stanley's May 12 motion for reconsideration is denied as forth in the Memorandum Opinion & Order. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 5/13/2014) (gr)
|
|
Filing
118
OPINION & ORDER. NCUA'S March 18, 2014 motion to strike is granted in part. Defenses 7, 8, 9, 17, 18, 21, 22, 24, 26, 29, and 30 are stricken from Morgan Stanley's February 25, 2014 answer. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 4/28/2014) (gr)
|
|
Filing
54
OPINION AND ORDER. The November 13, 2013 motion to dismiss is granted as to the Securities Act claims only. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 1/22/2014) (gr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
