Brown v. The City of New York et al
| Shone Brown |
| The City of New York, Dora Schriro, J. Davis, John Doe, Beltz, Skepple, McKenzie, R. James, Grinkley, Fearri and John and Jane Doe |
| 1:2013cv06912 |
| September 30, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Bronx |
| Thomas P. Griesa |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re: 63 MOTION to Dismiss Certain Claims in the Amended Complaint filed by Daniel O'Connell, Brian Suprenant, Jose F. Freire, Joseph Ponte, Raymond A. Beltz, Ronald Rudolph, R. James, Fearri, Grinkle y, Felipe Laboriel, Beltz, Regina James, Kenyonda Grinkley, The City of New York, Skepple, Edwin Skepple, Tretjen: For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion to dismiss certain claims in the amended complaint is granted in part an d denied in part. All of Brown's claims against the Individual Defendants in their official capacities are dismissed. All of Brown's § 1983 claims against Commissioner Ponte and CO Freire are dismissed for lack of personal involvement. Brown's § 1983 claims for deliberate indifference only are also dismissed as to Warden Suprenant, Deputy Warden Laboriel, Deputy Warden O'Connell, Assistant Deputy Warden Beltz, Captain Skepple, and CO Tietjen. Brown's claims und er the New York State Constitution against the Individual Defendants are dismissed. Brown's claim against the City for negligent hiring and retention is dismissed. Brown's state law tort claims against Commissioner Ponte, Warden Suprenant, Deputy Warden O'Connell, Captain Rudolph, and CO Tietjen are dismissed. All other claims in the amended complaint remain. Brown's motion for reconsideration is denied. This opinion resolves the items listed at docket numbers 63 and 73. (Signed by Judge Thomas P. Griesa on 4/17/2017) (jwh)
|
|
Filing
61
OPINION: Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of the court's August 19, 2014 order bifurcating plaintiff's Monell claim is denied. This opinion resolves the motions numbered 34 and 42 on the docket. (As further set forth in this Opinion) (Signed by Judge Thomas P. Griesa on 2/16/2016) (kl)
|
|
Filing
49
OPINION: The court grants plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended complaint, and therefore denies defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings. This resolves the motions numbered 13 and 22. (As further set forth in this Order) (Signed by Judge Thomas P. Griesa on 11/13/2015) (kl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
