Weston Capital Advisors, Inc. v. PT Bank Mutiara, TKB
| Weston Capital Advisors, Inc. |
| PT Bank Mutiara, TKB |
| 1:2013cv06945 |
| October 1, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Paul A. Crotty |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 oc Diversity-Other Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
276
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The above entitled action has been on the Court's active docket since October 1, 2013, and there having been no activity since September 20, 2019, it is, ORDERED, that the above-entitled action is DISMISSED, without prejudice. Either party shall notify the Court in the event this matter should be reinstated. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on 4/7/2021) (ks)
|
|
Filing
275
OPINION & ORDER re: 247 MOTION to Disqualify . filed by Weston Capital Advisors, Inc., 244 MOTION for Sanctions on Opposing Counsel in connection with the Motion for Recusal. filed by PT Bank Mutiara, TKB. For the fo regoing reasons, Weston's motion for recusal is DENIED and Bank Mutiara's cross-motion for sanctions is GRANTED. Kriegsman is ordered to (1) pay Bank of Mutiara its attorneys' fees spent in opposing the motion for disqualification an d in preparing the motion for sanctions; and (2) forfeit to the Court any fees Weston paid him for opposing the present motion for sanctions. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate the motions at Dkt. 247 and Dkt. 244. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on 9/20/2019) (ks)
|
|
Filing
195
OPINION & ORDER: The Court preliminarily enjoins the transfer, encumbrance of, or alteration in the rights of the Contemnor Assets, including by diluting or changing the rights accruing to the Equity Interests, or altering the Contemnors' corpo rate forms. If the Contemnors do not comply withthe Court's Funds and Fee Orders-Dr satisfactorily demonstrate that the preliminary injunction should be lifted-the Court will order the revesting of the Judgments 21 days after issuance of this Op inion & Order ("O&O"); the turn over and revesting of the Securities 42 days after issuance of this O&O; and the turn over and revesting of the Equity Interest 63 days afterissuance of this O&O. Bank Mutiara must submit three proposed order s to the Court by the close of business on Friday, February 17, 2017. The first proposed order shall be for the revesting of the Judgments 21 days after the issuance of this O&O. The second proposed order shall be for the turn over andrevesting of the Securities 42 days after the issuance of this O&O. The third proposed order shall be for the turn over and revesting of the Equity Interests 63 days after the issuance of this O&O. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on 2/13/2017) (anc)
|
|
Filing
147
OPINION & ORDER re: 102 MOTION Hold in Contempt . filed by PT Bank Mutiara, TKB. For the reasons above, the Court expands its March 19, 2014 contempt order to non-parties Liegey; Weston International Capital Management (Luxembo urg) S.A.; Weston International Capital (Mauritius) Ltd.; Weston International Capital Ltd.; Weston Capital Services Ltd.; First Capital Management Ltd.; First Global Funds Ltd. PCC; Weston International Investments Limited; Arlington Assets Invest ments Ltd.; Weston International Asset Recovery Co. Ltd.; and Weston International Asset Recovery Corporation Inc. The Court also imposes sanctions of $1,000 per day jointly and severally on the contemners, with the daily fine doubling each month until the contemners comply with the Court's March 19, 2014 order. (As further set forth in this Order) (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on 9/8/2015) (lmb)
|
|
Filing
101
SUMMARY ORDER: Defendant's motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff is directed to remove its AEO designation from its documents produced. Each party is to bear the attorneys' fees and expenses of this motion. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminated doc # 94 in 13-cv-6945 and doc # 30 in 14-cv-4469. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on 2-5-15) (mov)
|
|
Filing
36
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re: 27 MOTION to Vacate Judgment filed by PT Bank Mutiara, TKB. For the foregoing reasons, the Court vacates the October 4, 2013 order, but allows Plaintiff, if it chooses to do so, to seek an order of attachment. The Court's Order is signed separately. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on 11/19/2013) (rsh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Weston Capital Advisors, Inc. v. PT Bank Mutiara, TKB | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Weston Capital Advisors, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Taraneh Jean Marciano |
| Represented By: | Philip David Robben |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: PT Bank Mutiara, TKB | |
| Represented By: | Marc Laurence Greenwald |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
