Morillo v. Grand Hyatt New York et al
| Alba Beltre Morillo |
| Grand Hyatt New York, Mark Mason, New York Hotel & Motel Trades Council, AFL-CIO and Hazel Hazzard |
| 1:2013cv07123 |
| October 8, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| John G. Koeltl |
| Labor/Management Relations |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
OPINION AND ORDER re: 8 FIRST MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Alba Beltre Morillo, 15 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Hazel Hazzard, New York Hotel & Motel Trades Council, AFL-CIO: The Court has considered all of the arguments raised by the parties. To the extent not specifically addressed, the arguments are either moot or without merit. For the reasons explained above, the plaintiff's motion to remand is denied and the Union Defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted. The Clerk is directed to close all pending motions. The plaintiffs, Grand Hyatt, and Mason agree that the case should be remanded to the state court if the Union Defendants are dismissed from th e case. Because the Union Defendants are dismissed from the case, the remaining claims are remanded to the New York State Supreme Court, New York County. The Clerk is directed to remand the case. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 7/10/2014) (tn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
