Kovach v. The City University of New York et al
| Kathleen Kovach |
| The City University of New York, Karen Gould, Michael Hewitt, Denise Flanagan, Steve Little, Steve Czirak, Ralph Carmosino and Alan Gilbert |
| 1:2013cv07198 |
| October 11, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Lorna G. Schofield |
| Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12112 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
114
OPINION & ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff is entitled to $8,375.82 in attorneys' fees and expenses, and Jones Morrison is entitled to a charging lien in the amount of $17,529.07. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 10/6/2015) (kgo)
|
|
Filing
74
OPINION AND ORDER: re: 50 FIRST MOTION for Attorney Fees Notice of Motion filed by Kathleen Kovach. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff is entitled to $110,880.87 in attorneys' fees and expenses, and the Vladeck Firm is enti tled to a charging lien in the amount of $70,523.83. All matters in this case having been resolved, No later than June 11, 2015, the parties shall file a proposed order of judgment consistent with this Opinion. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motion at Dkt. No. 50. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 6/04/2015) (ama)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
