American Civil Liberties Union et al v. United States Department of Justice
| American Civil Liberties Union and American Civil Liberties Union Foundation |
| United States Department of Justice |
| 1:2013cv07347 |
| October 17, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Robert W. Sweet |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 62 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by United States Department of Justice. For the reasons stated above, the DOJ's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 62) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate all pending motions and to close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 5/2/2017) (anc)
|
|
Filing
61
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 52 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by American Civil Liberties Union, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, 47 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by United States Department of Justice. For the reasons stated above, DOJ's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART without prejudice. The ACLU's cross-motion is GRANTED insofar as it challenges the adequacy of DOJ's Vaughn submissions on behalf of EOU SA and with respect to NSD Doc. No. 7, and is otherwise DENIED. The denial of the ACLU's motion is without prejudice to the extent that the motion challenges the withholding of documents by EOUSA and NSD Doc. No. 7. DOJ is directed to submit rev ised Vaughn submissions addressing the documents withheld by EOUSA and NSD Doc. No. 7 and a segregability analysis addressing the NSD documents the Court has found to be within the scope of Exemption 5, along with a renewed motion for partial summary judgment no later than November 14, 2016. The ACLU may file a renewed cross-motion for summary judgment with respect to the documents withheld by EOUSA and NSD Doc. No. 7 no later than 30 days from the date of service of DOJ's renewed motion. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motions pending at Dkt. Nos. 47 and 52. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Motions due by 11/14/2016.) (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 9/27/2016) (kko)
|
|
Filing
35
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 17 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment, filed by United States Department of Justice, 23 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment, filed by American Civil Liberties Union, American Civil Liberties Unio n Foundation. The ACLU's motion for summary judgment based on the scope of DOJ's search is GRANTED IN PART as described above. The Court orders DOJ to conduct a new search for the documents requested in Part 3, without limiting that search to "governing" documents, and to release any responsive records that do not fall under a FOIA exemption. To the extent that the ACLU's motion challenges other aspects of DOJ's search, it is DENIED IN PART. The government's mo tion for summary judgment based on the applicability of Exemption 5 to the documents listed in the government's Vaughn index is GRANTED. The ACLU's cross-motion on that issue is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motions pending at docket numbers 17 and 23 and to close this case. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 3/3/2015) (kko)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
