Suarez v. SCF Cedar L.L.C. et al
Yarissa Suarez |
SCF Cedar L.L.C. and Joseph Nieves |
1:2013cv07420 |
October 22, 2013 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
Bronx |
Ronald L. Ellis |
Andrew L. Carter |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 34 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Ronald E. Ellis pursuant to Orders dated June 8, 2015. Magistrate Judge Ellis issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") on March 14, 2016, recommending that Plaintiffs motion to enforce the settlement agreement be granted and judgment be entered in the amount of $22,500. Despite notification of the right to object to the R&R, no objections were filed. When no objection is made, the Court subjec ts the R&R to a clear error review. Arthur v. Goard, No. 06 Civ. 326 (DLC), 2008 WL 482866, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 21, 2008) ("To accept those portions of the report to which no timely objection has been made, 'a district court need only sati sfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record."' (quoting Figueroa v. Riverbay Corp., No. 06 Civ. 5364 (PAC), 2006 WL 3804581, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 22, 2006))). The Court's review finds no clear error. In light of the foregoing, the Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Ellis' R&R. So ordered. Re 33 Report and Recommendations. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 11/7/2016) (rjm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.