Demark v. Powell et al
| Karen Van Demark |
| Fay Powell and Bedford Hills C.F. |
| 1:2013cv07843 |
| November 4, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Westchester |
| Thomas P. Griesa |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
OPINION re: 27 LETTER MOTION to Stay and FRCP 41(b) dismissal: Before this court is a motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Defendant asserts that plaintiff Karen Va n Demark's failure to respond to discovery requests and general lack of responsiveness warrants the court's dismissal of her complaint. For the reasons given above, defendant's motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 1(b) is conditionally granted. Plaintiff is ordered to file a written explanation of her failures to respond to defendant's discovery requests and deposition within thirty (30) days of the date of this Opinion. If plaintiff fails to respond within 30 days, plaintiff's case will be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41(b). This resolves Docket Number 27 in this case. (Signed by Judge Thomas P. Griesa on 9/25/2017) (jwh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
