Magnesium Corporation of America et al v. The Renco Group, Inc. et al
| Lee E. Buchwald |
| The Renco Group, Inc., Sabel Industries, Inc., K. Sabel Holdings, Inc., KPMG Peat Marwick LLP, Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Securities Corporation, Houlihan Lokey Howard & Zukin, Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft, LLP, Ira Leon Rennert, Roger L. Fay, Justin W. D'atri, Dennis A. Sadlowski, Michael C. Ryan, Michael H. Legge, Ron L. Thayer, Todd R. Ogaard, Lee R. Brown, Howard I. Kaplan, Keith Sabel, Unidentified Trustees, DOES I through XX, Credit Suisse First Boston LLC, KPMG LLP and Houlihan Lokey |
| Magnesium Corporation of America |
| 1:2013cv07948 |
| November 7, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Robert W. Sweet |
| Withdrawal |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 157 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
423
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. For the foregoing reasons, the motion by Defendants The Renco Group, Ira Rennert, and the Trustees of the Rennert Trust for judgment as a matter of law is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff's claims for unjust enrichment and punitive damages, and DENIED in all other respects. The same Defendants' motion for a new trial is DENIED. The remaining Defendants' motion for judgment as a matter of law is DENIED as moot. Plaintiff's motion to alter or amend the j udgment to increase the amount of prejudgment interest is DENIED. Because the Trustees of the Rennert Trust were liable only for Plaintiffs unjust enrichment claim, the Clerk is requested to amend the judgment to indicate that Plaintiff shall take no thing from Defendant Trustees of the Rennert Trust. The Clerk is requested to further amend the judgment to remove any punitive damages award. The judgment shall otherwise remain the same in all respects. This resolves Docket Nos. 402, 407, and 408. The Clerk is requested to terminate the case. Denying 402 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; Granting in part and denying in part 407 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; Denying 408 Motion to Alter Judgment. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 8/19/2015) (rjm)
|
|
Filing
325
ORDER: For the foregoing reasons herein, Defendants' oral motion for a mistrial made after the jury was dismissed, and their request that the Court refrain from entry of judgment on the grounds of a claimed inconsistency in the verdict, are DENIED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 3/4/2015) (kgo)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER: denying 24 Motion in Limine. To summarize: Defendants' motion for a protective order preventing the Trustee from compelling trial testimony during his case in chief from witnesses beyond the Court's subpoenapower is DENIED. Ins tead, any such witness from which Defendants wish to elicit live testimony must be made available to testify in the Trustee's case in chief. If Defendants would prefer that the witnesses remain at home, both sides will offer their testimony by d eposition. (The Court strongly encourages Defendants not to insist on this approach.) However, the Court-implementing its standard trial practices-will structure trial so that, if feasible and fair,witnesses need only take the stand once. This resolves Docket No. 24. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 8/22/2014) (djc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
