Cruz v. Wyckoff Heights Med. Center et al
Plaintiff: David Cruz
Defendant: Wyckoff Heights Med. Center and John Leison
Case Number: 1:2013cv08355
Filed: November 15, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: New York
Presiding Judge: Edgardo Ramos
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12112
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 23, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 103 OPINION AND ORDER re: 59 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by John Leison, Wyckoff Heights Med. Center. For the reasons set forth above, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion, Doc. 59, and close the case. It is SO ORDERED. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 9/23/2016) (kko)
July 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 97 OPINION AND ORDER re: 93 MOTION to Strike Document No. 90 filed by John Leison, Wyckoff Heights Med. Center. The following paragraphs from Pl.'s Statement do not cite to any admissible evidence in the record, and thus the Court wi ll not consider them pursuant to Rule 56(c)(1)(A) and Local Rule 56.1(d): (As further set forth in this Order.) The Court will reserve judgment on whether to disregard the following paragraphs in the Cruz Aff. that, according to Defendants, contra dict Plaintiffs previous deposition testimony: 16, 17, and 22. Motions for reconsideration must be submitted on or before July 29, 2016. See Local Rule 6.3 (permitting the Court to set a deadline for motions for reconsideration). If such a motion is made, the moving papers must make specific reference to individual paragraphs in Pl.'s Statement, Pl.'s Response, and/or the Cruz Aff., and must contain specific pinpoint citations to evidence already in the record. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion, Doc. 93. It is SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 7/19/2016) (kko)
May 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER: No party has objected to the R&R. The Court has reviewed Judge Maas's R&R and finds no error, clear or otherwise. Judge Maas reached his determination after a careful review of the parties' submissions. R&R 2-7. The Court therefore A DOPTS Judge Maas's recommended judgment for the reasons stated in the R&R. Furthermore, the parties' failure to file written objections precludes appellate review of this decision. PSG Poker, LLC v. DeRosa-Grund, No.06 CIV. 1104 (DLC), 2008 WL 3852051, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 15, 2008) (citing United States v. Male Juvenile, 121 F.3d 34, 38 (2d Cir. 1997). It is SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 5/15/2015) (ama)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cruz v. Wyckoff Heights Med. Center et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Cruz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wyckoff Heights Med. Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Leison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?