Chen et al v. Kaijou Restaurant et al
| Qin Chen, Zai Song Chen, Yao Fu and Zhen Rong Lin |
| Kaijou Restaurant, BPC Restaurant Holding Ltd., MJK Restaurant, Inc., Kent Chan, Peter Chau, Margaret H. Liu, Paula Doe, Harvey Xu and Eddy Zou |
| 1:2013cv08968 |
| December 18, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Kings |
| Paul A. Crotty |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 206 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
92
OPINION & ORDER re: 74 FIRST MOTION for Summary Judgment (Refiled). filed by Margaret H. Liu, 62 MOTION for Summary Judgment //Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Margaret H. Liu. filed by Zhen Rong Lin, Qin Chen, Yao Fu, Zai Song Chen. Given genuine disputes as to material facts, summary judgment cannot be granted and the cross-motions for summary judgment are DENIED. The parties are directed to appear at a conference scheduled for Wednesday, February 10 at 10:45 am, in Courtroom 14C. The Clerk is directed to terminate the motions at Docket 62 and 74. (As further set forth in this Order), ( Status Conference set for 2/10/2016 at 10:45 AM in Courtroom 14C, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Paul A. Crotty.) (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on 1/21/2016) (lmb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
