Fresh Del Monte Produce, Inc. v. Del Monte Corporation
Plaintiff: Fresh Del Monte Produce, Inc.
Defendant: Del Monte Corporation
Case Number: 1:2013cv08997
Filed: December 19, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: XX Out of State
Presiding Judge: J. Paul Oetken
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 20, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 102 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re: 69 MOTION to Dismiss Counterclaims in Del Monte Foods, Inc.'s Second Amended Counterclaims. filed by Fresh Del Monte Produce, Inc. For the reasons that follow, Fresh Del Montes motion to dismiss is gra nted in part and denied in part...For the foregoing reasons, Fresh Del Montes motion to dismiss Del Monte Foods counterclaims is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. To the extent that Del Monte Foods has asserted counterclaims for conduct prior to Se ptember 10, 2010, Fresh Del Montes motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Fresh Del Montes motion to dismiss is DENIED as to counterclaims concerning subsequent conduct, as well as the counterclaim for declaratory judgment. The motion to dismiss is GRANTED as to Combination products that combine fresh fruit and either fresh vegetables or fresh produce, but the motion is DENIED as to products that combine nonfresh fruit with vegetables or produce. Finally, Fresh Del Montes motion to dismiss the counterclaim for termination of the License is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motion at docket number 69. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 1/20/2016) (mt)
May 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 90 OPINION AND ORDER. For the reasons stated in this Opinion and Order, FDP's motion to compel production of the identified email communications between DMFI and its licensees (Docket #54) is granted. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein on 5/28/2015) (rjm)
December 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 38 OPINION AND ORDER re: 25 MOTION for Leave to File Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff's First Amended Answer and Counterclaims . filed by Del Monte Foods, Inc.. For the reasons stated herein, defendant/counterclaim-plaintiff DM FI's motion for leave to amend its answer and counterclaims (Docket # 25) is granted. The proposed pleading shall be filed forthwith. The parties should consult on the adjustments that will need to be made to the existing discovery schedule and make an appropriate application to the Court. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein on 12/8/2014) (kgo)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fresh Del Monte Produce, Inc. v. Del Monte Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fresh Del Monte Produce, Inc.
Represented By: Lauren Emily Aguiar
Represented By: Anthony Joseph Dreyer
Represented By: Jamie Edward Stockton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Del Monte Corporation
Represented By: Carla Christofferson
Represented By: Victor Jih
Represented By: Abby Faith Rudzin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?