Gramercy Advisors LLC v. Ripley et al
Plaintiff: Gramercy Advisors LLC
Defendant: the Robert L. Ripley Living Trust, Frances Ripley, Robert Ripley and Cary Investments LLC
Case Number: 1:2013cv09070
Filed: December 23, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: XX Out of State
Presiding Judge: Richard M. Berman
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 87 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 62 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 57 Memorandum & Opinion, filed by the Robert L. Ripley Living Trust, Frances Ripley, Cary Investments LLC, Robert Ripley: For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion for reconsideration and certification is DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate Dkt. 62. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 11/12/2014) (tn)
August 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 57 OPINION AND ORDER re: 34 MOTION to Dismiss . filed by the Robert L. Ripley Living Trust, Frances Ripley, Cary Investments LLC, Robert Ripley, 52 MOTION to Strike Document No. 49 . filed by the Robert L. Ripley Living Trust, Fra nces Ripley, Cary Investments LLC, Robert Ripley. For the forgoing reasons, Defendants motion to dismiss is DENIED in part and GRANTED as to Plaintiffs' allegations of breach of a covenant not to sue. Defendants' motion to exclude porti ons of the Lanava Declaration is DISMISSED as moot the Court did not consider the three challenged paragraphs. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate Dkt. 34 and Dkt. 52. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 8/25/2014) (djc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gramercy Advisors LLC v. Ripley et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: the Robert L. Ripley Living Trust
Represented By: Neal Matthew Sher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Frances Ripley
Represented By: Neal Matthew Sher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert Ripley
Represented By: Neal Matthew Sher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cary Investments LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gramercy Advisors LLC
Represented By: Sean F. O'Shea
Represented By: Michael Edward Petrella
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?