Searls, Individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Pom Wonderful, LLC et al.
| Alicia Searls, Individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated |
| Pom Wonderful, LLC et al. |
| 1:2013mc00261 |
| July 24, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Part One |
| Other |
| M 08-85 Motion to Quash |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Searls, Individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Pom Wonderful, LLC et al. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Alicia Searls, Individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated | |
| Represented By: | Robert Michael Brill |
| Represented By: | Anita Magdalena Jaskot |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Pom Wonderful, LLC et al. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
