United States of America et al v. Hawker Beechcraft Corporation
Plaintiff: United States of America, Donald Minge and David Kiehl
Defendant: Hawker Beechcraft Corporation
Case Number: 1:2013mc00373
Filed: November 5, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: New York
Presiding Judge: P. Kevin Castel
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: M 47 Bankruptcy Cases - Before Appeal Filed

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 43 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, the July 24, 2013 order of the bankruptcy court is REVERSED in part. The adversary proceeding is REMANDED to the bankruptcy court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 3/27/2014) (tro)
December 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 23 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 1 Motion for leave to appeal from the August 2, 2013 decision of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (Bernstein, J.)(the "Decision"), which dismissed in part the complaint filed in their adversary proceeding in the Chapter 11 reorganization case of Hawker Beechcraft Corporation ("HBC"). In re Hawker Beechcraft, Inc., 493 B.R. 696 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2013).... For the foregoing reasons, plaintiffs' motion f or leave to file an interlocutory appeal (Dkt. No. 1) is GRANTED. Plaintiffs are directed to file their brief on appeal, together with the record on appeal, by January 13, 2014. Defendants' answering brief is due January 27, 2014, and plaintiffs' reply is due February 3, 2014. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 12/17/2013) (ja)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America et al v. Hawker Beechcraft Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Ralph A. Siciliano
Represented By: Richard Walker Trotter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Donald Minge
Represented By: Tammy Phyllis Bieber
Represented By: Ralph A. Siciliano
Represented By: Richard Walker Trotter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Kiehl
Represented By: Tammy Phyllis Bieber
Represented By: Ralph A. Siciliano
Represented By: Richard Walker Trotter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hawker Beechcraft Corporation
Represented By: Douglas W. Baruch
Represented By: Paul Basta
Represented By: Ross Mitchell Kwasteniet
Represented By: Scott Andrew McMillin
Represented By: James H.M. Sprayregen
Represented By: Jennifer M Wollenberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?