Kamdem-Ouaffo v. Pepsico Inc. et al
||Pepsico Inc., Peter S. Given, Jr., Naijie Zhang and John Doe and/or Jane Doe
||January 31, 2014
||US District Court for the Southern District of New York
||White Plains Office
||XX Out of State
||Kenneth M. Karas
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 1331
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|January 26, 2016
OPINION & ORDER re: 72 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. filed by ScentSational Technologies LLC, Steven M. Landau, 75 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. filed by Peter S. Given, Jr., Naijie Zhang, Pepsico Inc. Defendants' Motions To Dismiss are granted, and Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to terminate the pending Motions, (see Dkt. Nos. 72, 75), and close the case. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 1/26/16) (yv)
|March 9, 2015
OPINION & ORDER: Defendants' Motion To Dismiss is granted. Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff may file a Second Amended Complaint within thirty days that specifically addresses the deficiencie s identified in this Opinion. Also, Plaintiff may renew his request to join Scentsational Technologies LLC and Steven M. Landau and file claims against them. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to terminate the pending Motion (Dkt. No. 34). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 3/9/2015) (lnl)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?