Sadis & Goldberg, LLP v. Banerjee
Plaintiff: Sadis & Goldberg, LLP
Defendant: Sumanta Banerjee
Case Number: 1:2014cv00913
Filed: February 13, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: New York
Presiding Judge: Laura Taylor Swain
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
RSS Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 253 ORDER: The Court's previous Order in this case directed Plaintiff to file a status letter every 90 days. See ECF 249. Plaintiff has not filed a status letter in accordance with the Court's Order since December of 2021. Plaintiff is directed to file a status letter by July 15, 2022, informing the Court of the status of this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang on 7/11/2022) (ks)
June 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 249 ORDER: In light of the Suggestion of Bankruptcy filed on Defendant's behalf on June 1, 2021, this action is automatically STAYED pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(a). Plaintiff shall file a status letter regarding the bankruptcy proceeding on September 1, 2021 and every 90 days thereafter. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang on 6/3/2021) (rro)
December 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 221 ORDER terminating 197 Motion to Approve ; terminating 215 Letter Motion to Seal. The Court has reviewed Defendant's motion to seal and the challenged exhibits. The motion to seal/redact is GRANTED as to specified portions of exhibits 25 , 36-38, 43, 45-46, 88-90, 93, 95, 126, 133, and 134. The motion is also GRANTED as to the designated birthdates within exhibit 6 and the specific numbers only contained in the proposed redacted sections in exhibit 87. Defendant's motion is D ENIED as to all other portions of exhibits 6 and 87. As the Court is unable to seal only portions of a docket entry under the new sealing procedures, the Clerk is respectfully directed to restrict viewing of the following filings to the parties an d Court personnel only: ECF 201. ECF 202 Plaintiff is directed to review the ECF Rules & Instructions, section 6, and refile its submissions, originally filed at ECF 201 and 202, with the granted redactions by January 6, 2020. The Clerk is respectfully directed to close ECF 197 and ECF 215. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang on 12/10/2020) (rro)
July 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 214 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER re: 171 MOTION for Attorney Fees Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a)(5)(B). filed by Sadis & Goldberg, LLP. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees is DENIED. Future motions filed that are baseless, not made in good faith, or that unreasonably or vexatiously multiply the proceedings may subject the relevant party to sanctions under Rule 37(a)(5) of the Federal Rules, 28 U.S.C. § 1927, or the Court's inherent authority. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang on 7/30/2020) (rro)
March 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 193 ORDER: An evidentiary hearing was held in this matter on March 3, 2020. A continued evidentiary hearing will be held on Thursday, April 23, 2020. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang on 3/5/2020) (rro)
January 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 190 ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that the hearing scheduled for February 27, 2020 is adjourned. A rescheduled evidentiary hearing will be held on Tuesday March 3, 2020 at 10:00 a.m. The parties' joint exhibit list and deposition designations are due by February 25, 2020. SO ORDERED. (Evidentiary Hearing set for 3/3/2020 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang on 1/21/2020) (rro)
January 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 188 ORDER: The Court is in receipt of Defendant's request to adjourn the evidentiary hearing scheduled for January 22, 2020 and Plaintiff's opposition to the request. The Court notes for the record that these letters were emailed to Chamber s due to privacy concerns expressed by Defendant. It is hereby ORDERED that the hearing scheduled for January 22, 2020 is adjourned. A rescheduled evidentiary hearing will now be held on Thursday February 27, 2020 at 2:00 p.m. The parties' joint exhibit list and deposition designations are due by February 14, 2020. SO ORDERED. ( Evidentiary Hearing set for 2/27/2020 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang on 1/15/2020) (va)
November 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 186 ORDER, The Court is in receipt of the joint letter at ECF 185. The evidentiary hearing will be held on Wednesday, January 22, 2020 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 20D, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007. Parties are only to submit post-trial briefing. A joint status letter is due by December 19, 2020. SO ORDERED. (Evidentiary Hearing set for 1/22/2020 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 20D, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang on 11/20/19) (yv)
August 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 165 OPINION & ORDER re: 146 FIRST MOTION to Quash 141 142 filed by Sumanta Banerjee. For the reasons discussed above, Defendant's Motion to Quash is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close ECF 146 and mail a copy of this Opinion and Order to the pro se Defendant. If Plaintiff intends to file a motion for payment of expenses under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a)(5)(B), Plaintiff shall meet and confer with Defendant and provide a proposed briefing schedule by September 6, 2019. Plaintiff is directed to serve the subpoenas on Fidelity and HRB by August 30, 2019. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang on 8/26/2019) (rro) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
March 30, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 76 MEMORANDUM ORDER: denying 48 Motion to Set Aside Judgment. For the foregoing reasons, Defendant's motion to set aside default judgment and motion to vacate default is denied. This Memorandum Opinion and Order resolves Docket Entry No. 48. SO ORDERED.(Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 3/30/2017) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (ama)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sadis & Goldberg, LLP v. Banerjee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sadis & Goldberg, LLP
Represented By: Douglas R Hirsch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sumanta Banerjee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?