Calderon v. The City of New York et al
| Miguelina Calderon |
| The City of New York, James South and John/Jane Doe 1-10 |
| 1:2014cv01082 |
| February 20, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Bronx |
| Paul A. Engelmayer |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
58
OPINION & ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, Calderon's motion for reconsideration is granted. The City of New York is reinstated as a defendant to the state-law claim of false arrest. The Clerk is directed to terminate the motion pending at Dkt. 53. The parties are directed to file a joint letter with the Court by November 2, 2015 proposing next steps in this litigation. (As further set forth in this Order) (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 10/19/2015) (kl)
|
|
Filing
52
OPINION & ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, the Court denies defendants' motion to dismiss Calderon's federal and state claims of false arrest, as brought against defendants South and Sosa. The Court, however, grants defendants' motion to dismiss Calderon's Monell claim, and therefore dismisses the City of New York as a defendant from this lawsuit. The Court also dismisses all claims against the John and Jane Doe defendants. The Clerk of Court is directed to termina te the motion pending at docket number 45. An order will issue shortly as to next steps in this case. (As further set forth in this Order) John/Jane Doe 1-10 and The City of New York terminated. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 10/5/2015) (kl)
|
|
Filing
34
OPINION & ORDER #105484 re: 26 MOTION to Dismiss filed by The City of New York, James South. For the foregoing reasons, the Court grants defendants' motion to dismiss Calderon's SAC, without prejudice to Calderon& #039;s right to file a Third Amended Complaint ("TAC"). The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at docket number 26 and to close this case. However, the Clerk shall reopen the case if Calderon files a TAC by May 29, 2015. In the event Calderon files such a pleading, the defendants' response will be due two weeks later. In the event defendants respond with a motion to dismiss, Calderon's brief in opposition will be due two weeks later, and defendants' reply will be due one week after that. If Calderon elects not to file a TAC, the dismissal will then be with prejudice. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 5/4/2015) (mro) Modified on 5/4/2015 (soh).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
