Tang v. Glocap Search L.L.C. et al
| Kia Song Tang |
| Glocap Search L.L.C. and Adam Zoia |
| 1:2014cv01108 |
| February 21, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Jesse M. Furman |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
143
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 132 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law filed by Kia Song Tang: For the reasons stated above, the Court is compelled - despite some misgivings about the jury's verdict - to deny Plaintiff's motion in its entirety. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Docket No. 132, and as further set forth in this order. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 9/16/2015) (tn)
|
|
Filing
79
OPINION AND ORDER re: 58 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Glocap Search L.L.C.: For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED with regard to Plaintiff's Title VII claims against Zoi a, and DENIED with regard to all other claims. Plaintiff's request to file three exhibits under seal is temporarily granted. Should Defendants wish for any of the three exhibits to remain under seal, they shall file an appropriate application , not to exceed five pages, by April 7, 2015. Per the Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order, within thirty days of this Opinion and Order, the parties shall submit to the Court for its approval a Joint Pretrial Order prepared in accordance wit h the Court's Individual Rules and Practices and Rule 26(a)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The parties shall also follow Paragraph 5 of the Court's Individual Rules and Practices, which identifies submissions that must be ma de at or before the time of the Joint Pretrial Order, including any motions in limine. If this action is to be tried before a jury, joint requests to charge, joint proposed verdict forms, and joint proposed voir dire questions shall be filed on or before the Joint Pretrial Order due date in accordance with the Court's Individual Rules and Practices. Jury instructions may not be submitted after the Joint Pretrial Order due date, unless they meet the standard of Rule 51(a)(2)(A) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. If this action is to be tried to the Court, proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law shall be filed on or before the Joint Pretrial Order due date in accordance with the Court's Individual Rules and P ractices. Unless the Court orders otherwise for good cause shown, the parties shall be ready for trial two weeks after the Joint Pretrial Order is filed. Finally, if the parties are interested in a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Fox, they shall so advise the Court by joint letter as soon as possible. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Docket No. 58. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 3/24/2015) (tn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
