Knutson v. G2 Investment Group et al
| Robert Knutson |
| G2 Investment Group, Forbes Private Capital Group, Stone Castle Securities LLC, Robert Holmen, Patrick Thomas and John Ou |
| 1:2014cv01694 |
| March 11, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Robert W. Sweet |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12112 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
178
CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 177 Memorandum & Opinion in favor of FPCG LLC, G2 Capital Markets, LLC, G2 FMV, LLC, G2 Investment Group, LLC, Stone Castle Securities, LLC, John Chihong Ou, Jonathan Todd Morley, Robert Christopher Holmen against Ro bert Knutson. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum and Order dated May 28, 2020, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. Defense counsel's motion to withdraw is denied as moot; accordingly, this case is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 5/28/2020) (Attachments: # 1 Right to Appeal) (km) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing
175
ORDER: On November 14, 2019, this case was referred to Magistrate Judge Fox for a Report and Recommendation on Defendants' motion for summary judgment. Dkt. No. 170. That referral is hereby ORDERED to be withdrawn. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 2/20/2020) (rro)
|
|
Filing
142
OPINION: re: 132 MOTION to Dismiss and For Judgment on the Pleading,s filed by FPCG LLC, G2 Capital Markets, LLC, Jonathan Todd Morley, G2 FMV, LLC, Stone Castle Securities, LLC, G2 Investment Group, LLC, John Chihong Ou, Robe rt Christopher Holmen. Plaintiff may disagree with the Second Circuit's reading of the ADA and ADEA statutory language, but it cannot be argued that the Second Circuit's unambiguous view must control here. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Firs t Claim under the ADA and Third Claim under the ADEA are dismissed as against individual Defendants Morley, Holmen, and Ou. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motions are granted, and as further set forth in this order. It is so ordered. (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 1/3/2018) (ap)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
