The KatiRoll Company Inc. v. Kati Junction Inc. et al
| The KatiRoll Company Inc. |
| Kati Junction Inc., John Doe, Akhter Hossain, Jewel Hossain, Kamal Hossain, Tariqul Islam, Nur Nobi, Shaikh Nuhul Alam and Nurun Nabi Chowdhury |
| 1:2014cv01750 |
| March 13, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Shira A. Scheindlin |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
OPINION AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, defendants' motion for summary judgment is DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this motion (Dkt. No. 71). A conference is scheduled for October 1, 2015 at 11:30 AM. (As further set forth in this Order) (Status Conference set for 10/1/2015 at 11:30 AM before Judge Shira A. Scheindlin.) (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 9/25/2015) (kl)
|
|
Filing
24
OPINION AND ORDER re: 9 MOTION to Dismiss . filed by Kamal Hossain, John Doe, Kati Junction Inc., Tariqul Islam, Nur Nobi, Akhter Hossain, Shaikh Nuhul Alam, Nurun Nabi Chowdhury, Jewel Hossain. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' partial motion to dismiss is DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this motion (Docket No. 9). A conference is scheduled for August 15, at 4:00 p.m. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 7/15/2014) (lmb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
