Baril v. JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.

Baril v. JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.

Plaintiff:	Steven Baril
Defendant:	JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.
Case Number:	1:2014cv02364
Filed:	March 28, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	Albany
Presiding Judge:	Unassigned
Nature of Suit:	Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 9, 2015	Filing 48 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER #105124. The plaintiff moves under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) to alter or amend the judgment. The motion is denied. While the plaintiff clearly disagrees with the Court's decision to dismiss his complaint, that is not a reason for the Court to reconsider this case. Because the plaintiff has failed to establish a basis for reconsideration or relief under Rules 59(e) and because he has failed to show exceptional circumstances sufficient for such relief, the plaintiff's motion is denied. The Clerk is directed to close docket nos. 42 and 47, and as further set forth. re: 47 MOTION to Strike Document No. 44 filed by Steven Baril, 42 MOTION to Alter Judgment re: 39 Clerk's Judgment, filed by Steven Baril. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 1/8/2015) (rjm) Modified on 1/9/2015 (soh).
November 26, 2014	Filing 38 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER #105006: re: 15 MOTION to Dismiss and/or for Summary Judgment. filed by JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. The Court has considered all of the arguments raised by the parties. To the extent not specifically address ed, the arguments are either moot or without merit. For the foregoing reasons, the defendants motion to dismiss or alternatively for summary judgment is granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment dismissing the Second Amended Complaint. The Clerk is also directed to close all pending motions. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 11/25/2014) (js) Modified on 11/26/2014 (ca).

Date Filed

Document Text

January 9, 2015

Filing 48 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER #105124. The plaintiff moves under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) to alter or amend the judgment. The motion is denied. While the plaintiff clearly disagrees with the Court's decision to dismiss his complaint, that is not a reason for the Court to reconsider this case. Because the plaintiff has failed to establish a basis for reconsideration or relief under Rules 59(e) and because he has failed to show exceptional circumstances sufficient for such relief, the plaintiff's motion is denied. The Clerk is directed to close docket nos. 42 and 47, and as further set forth. re: 47 MOTION to Strike Document No. 44 filed by Steven Baril, 42 MOTION to Alter Judgment re: 39 Clerk's Judgment, filed by Steven Baril. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 1/8/2015) (rjm) Modified on 1/9/2015 (soh).

November 26, 2014

Filing 38 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER #105006: re: 15 MOTION to Dismiss and/or for Summary Judgment. filed by JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. The Court has considered all of the arguments raised by the parties. To the extent not specifically address ed, the arguments are either moot or without merit. For the foregoing reasons, the defendants motion to dismiss or alternatively for summary judgment is granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment dismissing the Second Amended Complaint. The Clerk is also directed to close all pending motions. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 11/25/2014) (js) Modified on 11/26/2014 (ca).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Baril v. JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Steven Baril
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?