Wilson v. Corelogic Saferent, LLC
| Abdullah James George Wilson |
| Corelogic Saferent, LLC |
| 1:2014cv02477 |
| April 9, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Queens |
| J. Paul Oetken |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
128
OPINION AND ORDER: re: 104 MOTION to Certify Class filed by Abdullah James George Wilson, 105 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Corelogic Saferent, LLC. For the foregoing reasons, SafeRent's motion for partial summary judgment is DENIED. The motion for class certification is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motions at Docket Number 104 and 105. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 9/29/2017) (ama)
|
|
Filing
81
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER re: 78 LETTER MOTION to Compel and for Protective Order addressed to Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Ellis from Timothy J. St. George dated April 29, 2016 filed by Corelogic Saferent, LLC. IT IS HEREBY ORDE RED THAT (1) SafeRent's motion to compel Wilson to produce non-public documents pertaining to the Queens County Action is DENIED; (2) SafeRent's motion for a protective order prohibiting Rule 30(b)(6) questioning regarding SafeRent's m atching criteria (Topic No. 12) is GRANTED; (3)SafeRent's motion for a protective order prohibiting Rule 30(b)(6) questioning regarding SafeRent's dispute-handling processes (Topic. No. 14) and the software used to track disputes (Topic No. 15) is DENIED; and (4) All discovery shall be completed by June 24, 2016. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Discovery due by 6/24/2016.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Ellis on 5/23/2016) (kko) Modified on 5/24/2016 (kko).
|
|
Filing
72
OPINION AND ORDER: re: 48 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint filed by Abdullah James George Wilson. For the foregoing reasons, Judge Ellis' well-reasoned Report and Recommendation (Dkt No. 62) is ADOPTED in full and Wil son's motion for leave to amend is DENIED. Wilson's request that, in the alternative, "he be permitted to move for certification of the NY-FCRA section 380-j(e) class set forth in the proposed Amended Complaint following the completion of discovery" is also DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motion at docket number 48. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 2/08/2016) (ama)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
