Kelley v. The Universal Music Group et al
| Herman Kelley |
| The Universal Music Group, The Island Def Jam Music Group, Island Def Jam Records, Desert Storm Records, Kila Records and John David Jackson |
| 1:2014cv02968 |
| April 22, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Paul A. Engelmayer |
| Copyrights |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
106
OPINION & ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, the Court accepts and adopts Magistrate Judge Francis' July 5, 201 7, Report and Recommendation. It is hereby ordered that: (1) plaintiffs' claims against defendants UMG, IDJMG, andDIR are DISMISSED with prejudice; and (2) plaintiffs' claims against DSR, Killa, and Fabolous are DISMISSED without prejudice. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 9/11/2017) (anc)
|
|
Filing
101
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re: 78 Amended Complaint, filed by Bessie Banks, Herman Kelley. For the reasons discussed above, I recommend that this case be dismissed; the dismissal should be without prejudice as to DSR, Killa, and Fabolous. Pu rsuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1) and Rules 72, 6(a), and 6(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties shall have fourteen (14) days to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation. Such objection shall be filed with the Clerk of the Court, with extra copies delivered to the Chambers of the Honorable Paul A. Engelmayer, Room 2201, 40 Foley Square, New York, New York, 10007, and to the Chambers of the undersigned, Room 1960, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York 10007. Failure to file timely objections will preclude appellate review. (Objections to R&R due by 7/19/2017.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 7/5/2017) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (anc)
|
|
Filing
94
OPINION & ORDER re: 81 MOTION to Dismiss/Notice of Motion of UMG Recordings, Inc. to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint filed by Island Def Jam Records, The Universal Music Group, 91 MOTION for Judgment filed b y Herman Kelley. For the foregoing reasons, the Court grants UMG's motion to dismiss all claims in the SAC, save the copyright infringement claim as to the Composition. Plaintiffs may proceed to discovery on that claim. As per its practic e in pro se cases, the Court, by separate order, is referring this case to the assigned Magistrate Judge(Hon. James C. Francis IV) for general pretrial supervision. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions pending at docket numbers 81 and 91. (As further set forth in this Opinion & Order.) (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 9/29/2016) (mro)
|
|
Filing
70
OPINION & ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, the Court grants UMG's motion to dismiss, without prejudice to plaintiffs' right to file a Second Amended Complaint ("SAC"). Plaintiffs are directed to file a SAC by November 2 3, 2015. In the event plaintiffs file such a pleading, defendants' response will be due two weeks later. In the event defendants respond with a motion to dismiss, plaintiffs' brief in opposition will be due two weeks later, and def endants' reply will be due one week after that. If plaintiffs elect not to file a SAC, the case will be closed with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at docket number 48. (As further set forth in this Order) (Amended Pleadings due by 11/23/2015.) (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 10/19/2015) (kl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
