Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Holdings LLC
Plaintiff: Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Defendant: Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Holdings LLC
Case Number: 1:2014cv03020
Filed: April 28, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: Orange
Presiding Judge: Laura Taylor Swain
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 25, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 145 OPINION & ORDER: re: 111 MOTION for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c), filed by Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Holdings LLC. For the foregoing reasons, defendant's motion for summary judgment is DENIED in its entirety. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the open motion at ECF No. 111, and as further set forth in this order. (Signed by Judge Katherine B. Forrest on 1/25/2018) (ap)
January 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 141 OPINION & ORDER: For the reasons stated above, this Court hereby VACATES the Memorandum Opinion & Order at ECF No. 47 to the extent it dismisses Count III of Deutsche Bank's complaint. Count III, alleging breach of contract based on Morgan Stanley's failure to notify Deutsche Bank of material breaches in the underlying loan pool, is accordingly REINSTATED in this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Katherine B. Forrest on 1/10/2018) (ama)
April 3, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 47 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 18 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint. filed by Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Holdings LLC. The Court grants Defendant MSMC's motion insofar as it seeks dismissal of Counts Two, Three and Four of the Complaint. The Court denies MSMC's motion in all other respects. Plaintiff's request for leave to amend the Complaint in response to the Court's decision on this motion practice is denied, Plaintiff having chosen to opp ose this motion rather than seek leave to amend the Complaint in response to it. (See ECF Docket Entry No. 21 and Subdivision A.2.b.(iii) of the Individual Practices Rules of the undersigned.) This Memorandum Opinion and Order resolves Docket Entry N umber 18. The initial pre-trial conference in this case is scheduled for May 15, 2015, at 11:00 a.m. The parties must consult in advance of the conference and prepare a joint submission in accordance with the requirements of the Initial Conference Order. (See Docket Entry No. 3.) SO ORDERED. (See Order.) (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 4/3/2015) (ajs)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Holdings LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Represented By: Justin Michael Ellis
Represented By: Steven Francis Molo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Holdings LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?