Ross v. Miller

Ross v. Miller

Petitioner:	Sharma Ross
Respondent:	Christopher Miller
Case Number:	1:2014cv03098
Filed:	April 21, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	Washington
Presiding Judge:	Ronnie Abrams
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 28, 2018	Filing 49 OPINION & ORDER: Ross's objections to the Report are without merit. The Court has reviewed the portions of the Report not objected to and finds no clear error. Save for the two § 440 claims that relate back, leave to amend the Petition is accordingly denied, and the Petition-including those two § 440 claims-is denied, as is the motion to stay. Because Ross has not made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right, the Court declines to issue a certificate of a ppealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Love v. McCray, 413 F.3d 192, 195 (2d Cir. 2005). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), the Court certifies that any appeal of this order would not be taken in good faith. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438,445 (1962). The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 8/27/2018) (rj) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.

Date Filed

Document Text

August 28, 2018

Filing 49 OPINION & ORDER: Ross's objections to the Report are without merit. The Court has reviewed the portions of the Report not objected to and finds no clear error. Save for the two § 440 claims that relate back, leave to amend the Petition is accordingly denied, and the Petition-including those two § 440 claims-is denied, as is the motion to stay. Because Ross has not made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right, the Court declines to issue a certificate of a ppealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Love v. McCray, 413 F.3d 192, 195 (2d Cir. 2005). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), the Court certifies that any appeal of this order would not be taken in good faith. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438,445 (1962). The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 8/27/2018) (rj) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ross v. Miller
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Sharma Ross
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Christopher Miller
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?