Gunn v. USA

Gunn v. USA

Plaintiff:	Roderick Gunn
Defendant:	USA
Case Number:	1:2014cv03228
Filed:	April 28, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	Bronx
Presiding Judge:	William H. Pauley
Nature of Suit:	Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 21, 2023	Filing 38 MEMO ENDORSED ORDER denying 37 Motion for Reconsideration re 37 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 29 Memorandum & Opinion, filed by Roderick Gunn. ENDORSEMENT: The motion is denied. Submissions to the Court by represented parties must be by their counsel. The Clerk of Court shall terminate ECF 390. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein on 2/21/23) (yv)
March 7, 2017	Filing 29 OPINION & ORDER: The arguments advanced in Gunn's habeas petition in Case No. 14-CV-3228 are rejected. Gunn's motion for an evidentiary hearing is denied because his ineffective assistance of counsel claims are belied by the record. See Pug lisi v. United States, 586 F.3d 209, 213 (2d Cir. 2009) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 2255(b)). This Court reserves judgment on Gunn's arguments pursuant to Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015) in Case No. 16-CV-4887, pending further brie fing from the Federal Defenders of New York. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Case No. 14-CV-3228 and mark that case as closed. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Opinion and Order to the Federal Defender representing Gunn in Case No. 16-CV-4887. (Signed by Judge William H. Pauley, III on 3/7/2017) (cla)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 21, 2023

Filing 38 MEMO ENDORSED ORDER denying 37 Motion for Reconsideration re 37 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 29 Memorandum & Opinion, filed by Roderick Gunn. ENDORSEMENT: The motion is denied. Submissions to the Court by represented parties must be by their counsel. The Clerk of Court shall terminate ECF 390. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein on 2/21/23) (yv)

March 7, 2017

Filing 29 OPINION & ORDER: The arguments advanced in Gunn's habeas petition in Case No. 14-CV-3228 are rejected. Gunn's motion for an evidentiary hearing is denied because his ineffective assistance of counsel claims are belied by the record. See Pug lisi v. United States, 586 F.3d 209, 213 (2d Cir. 2009) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 2255(b)). This Court reserves judgment on Gunn's arguments pursuant to Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015) in Case No. 16-CV-4887, pending further brie fing from the Federal Defenders of New York. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Case No. 14-CV-3228 and mark that case as closed. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Opinion and Order to the Federal Defender representing Gunn in Case No. 16-CV-4887. (Signed by Judge William H. Pauley, III on 3/7/2017) (cla)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gunn v. USA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Represented By:	Daniel Marc Tracer
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roderick Gunn
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?