Sons of the Revolution in the State of New York, Inc. v. The Travelers Indemnity Company of America et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Southern District Sons of the Revolution in the State of New York, Inc. v. The Travelers Indemnity Company of America et al

Sons of the Revolution in the State of New York, Inc. v. The Travelers Indemnity Company of America et al

Plaintiff:	Sons of the Revolution in the State of New York, Inc.
Defendant:	The Travelers Indemnity Company of America and Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
Case Number:	1:2014cv03303
Filed:	May 7, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	New York
Presiding Judge:	Lorna G. Schofield
Nature of Suit:	Insurance
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	Defendant

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 11, 2014	Filing 35 OPINION AND ORDER re: 27 MOTION to Sever . filed by The Travelers Indemnity Company of America, 23 MOTION to Remand to State Court . filed by Sons of the Revolution in the State of New York, Inc.. For the foregoing reas ons herein, Plaintiff's motion to remand the case in its entirety is GRANTED, and Travelers' motion to sever is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motions at docket numbers 23 and 27, and REMAND all claims to the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 12/11/2014) (kgo)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 11, 2014

Filing 35 OPINION AND ORDER re: 27 MOTION to Sever . filed by The Travelers Indemnity Company of America, 23 MOTION to Remand to State Court . filed by Sons of the Revolution in the State of New York, Inc.. For the foregoing reas ons herein, Plaintiff's motion to remand the case in its entirety is GRANTED, and Travelers' motion to sever is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motions at docket numbers 23 and 27, and REMAND all claims to the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 12/11/2014) (kgo)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sons of the Revolution in the State of New York, Inc. v. The Travelers Indemnity Company of America et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sons of the Revolution in the State of New York, Inc.
Represented By:	Wystan M. Ackerman
Represented By:	Laura A. Torchio
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: The Travelers Indemnity Company of America
Represented By:	Wystan M. Ackerman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
Represented By:	Nancy B. Ludmerer
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?