Bhumithanarn et al v. 22 Noodle Market Corp. et al
||Manasicha Bhumithanarn, Thipakorn Yoopensuk and Vuttinant Assavasirisilp
||22 Noodle Market Corp., Kanruthai Makmuang and Luck Watanasuparp
||May 20, 2014
||US District Court for the Southern District of New York
||Foley Square Office
||Richard J. Sullivan
|Nature of Suit:
||Fair Labor Standards Act
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|July 13, 2015
OPINION & ORDER re: 19 FIRST MOTION to Amend/Correct 11 Amended Complaint, filed by Vuttinant Assavasirisilp, Thipakorn Yoopensuk, Manasicha Bhumithanarn, 22 FIRST MOTION to Certify Class filed by Vuttinant A ssavasirisilp, Thipakorn Yoopensuk, Manasicha Bhumithanarn. For the reasons set forth above, the Court grants Plaintiff's request to file an amended complaint, conditionally certifies Plaintiffs' first and second causes of action as a collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), permits distribution of notice via mail, workplace posting, and text message, and finds that a three-year notice period is appropriate. Defendants shall promptly prov ide Plaintiffs with the names, addresses, and phone numbers for individuals who worked for Defendants between May 20, 2011 and the present in both paper and electronic formats. Further, Plaintiffs shall submit a revised proposed class notice and text message for the Court's approval by July 27, 2015. The parties shall also submit a revised proposed case management plan by August 3, 2015. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 7/13/2015) (mro)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?