Romero v. ABCZ Corp. et al
| Sheldon Romero |
| ABCZ Corp., ABCZ II MGMT. Corp., Sushi Fun Dining & Catering, Inc., Pacific Club Holdings, Inc., West 20th Enterprises Corp., Selim "Sam" Zherka and John Does #1-10 |
| 1:2014cv03653 |
| May 21, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Analisa Torres |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
145
OPINION AND ORDER re: 144 JOINT MOTION for Settlement Parties' Joint Motion for Approval of FLSA Settlement, filed by Sheldon Romero. The parties have agreed to a total settlement of $100,000.00. The parties have also agreed th at $3,727.25 of the settlement figure will be allocated to reimburse plaintiff's counsel for their out-of-pocket costs, $32,090.88 (or one-third) of the remaining $96,272.75 will be paid to plaintiff's counsel as fees and th e remaining $64,181.87 will be paid to plaintiff. I approve the settlement in this matter. In light of the settlement, the action is dismissed with prejudice and without costs. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agree ment. See Hendrickson v. United States, 791 F.3d 354, 358 (2d Cir. 2015). The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to mark this matter closed. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 6/12/2017) Copies Transmitted By Chambers. (ras)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
