Greene v. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Southern District Greene v. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

Greene v. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

Plaintiff:	Lonnette Greene
Defendant:	U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Case Number:	1:2014cv03676
Filed:	May 22, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	New York
Presiding Judge:	Analisa Torres
Nature of Suit:	Housing/Accommodations
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 14, 2017	Filing 111 OPINION AND ORDER: HUD moves for judgment on the pleadings and summary judgment. (As further set forth in this Order.) For the reasons stated above, HUD's motions are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. It is further ORDERED that: 1. Greene an d HUD shall confer to craft a proposal as to how to proceed regarding Greene's remaining due process claims, including whether these claims should be stayed pending remand of Plaintiff's APA claims to HUD; 2. Greene and Deshler shall confe r to craft a proposal as to how to proceed regarding Greene's claims against Deshler, which were held in abeyance pending resolution of HUD's motions, see ECF No. 52; and 3. By July 6, 2017, the parties shall file a joint letter with thei r proposals as to how to proceed, including whether they believe a settlement conference before the Honorable Gabriel W. Gorenstein might be productive. The Court will review this letter and proceed accordingly. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 6/14/2017) (cf)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 14, 2017

Filing 111 OPINION AND ORDER: HUD moves for judgment on the pleadings and summary judgment. (As further set forth in this Order.) For the reasons stated above, HUD's motions are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. It is further ORDERED that: 1. Greene an d HUD shall confer to craft a proposal as to how to proceed regarding Greene's remaining due process claims, including whether these claims should be stayed pending remand of Plaintiff's APA claims to HUD; 2. Greene and Deshler shall confe r to craft a proposal as to how to proceed regarding Greene's claims against Deshler, which were held in abeyance pending resolution of HUD's motions, see ECF No. 52; and 3. By July 6, 2017, the parties shall file a joint letter with thei r proposals as to how to proceed, including whether they believe a settlement conference before the Honorable Gabriel W. Gorenstein might be productive. The Court will review this letter and proceed accordingly. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 6/14/2017) (cf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Greene v. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lonnette Greene
Represented By:	Mary Purdy McCune
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Represented By:	Elizabeth Tulis
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?